I thought about that and may go that direction, but ease/simplicity of adding "exclusions" is also a factor. I may have to take a survey. :-)
Thanks for all of your help. On 7/6/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/6/06, Rob Wilkerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, thanks. There doesn't seem to be any performance impact, but > this is a scaled down proof-of-concept implementation. I assume that > before implementing that rule it's implementing all of the preceeding > rules. Is there any reason I shouldn't move the /landingpage.cfm rule > to the top of the list? I don't see a problem with that. If speed is a big concern, you can also combine a bunch of the regexes into one by |-ing the conditions. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Rob Wilkerson --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
