I think that's what I meant by "embedded Linux HTTP server" I simply forgot its name. But of course should it been glaring to me that it only could be named "tux" ;-)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 8:13 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why doesn't Apache bind socket to > vhost's IP > addr.? > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 11:50:34AM CST, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > : > : I will have to watch the load on the server > : and then possibly decide on compiling a lean static httpd with > : only rudimentary functionality > : (e.g. this one wouldn't need mod_ssl, mod_vhost, mod_include, > : mod_rewrite, ...) > : which exclusively serves my private LAN. > : Maybe even CPAN's HTTP::Server::Simple or the embedded Linux > : Kernel HTTP server > : would suffice? > > If you need to serve static content, there are other solutions > that are faster and smaller than Apache (e.g. tux, thttpd). > > > -- > Eugene > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP > Server Project. > See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
