On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Boyle Owen wrote:

> >
> > Is there a consensus on compiling mod_ssl as shared or static?
>
> It depends on your application which is the more appropriate. The two 
> possibilities are not provided just to add a bit of spice to life, they're 
> there because in some situations it makes more sense to compile-in a module 
> statically while in others it's better to load it at runtime.
>
> Think about what each entails and the pros and cons of each approach and then 
> consider your case and decide which is more appropriate.
>
> Rgds,
> Owen Boyle
> Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored.
>
Thanks Owen,

The reason I am asking is that I have always compiled mod_ssl static and I
am now getting feedback from a customer who indicates that the problems he
is having related to SSLVerifyClient renegotiation are due to mod_ssl not
being compiled static. He has a static compiled mod_ssl and indicates that
this operation works fine but in the shared mod_ssl is does not.

Somehow I can't see how this operational issue is related.

Thanks again...

 ----------------------------------------
"Mon aƩroglisseur est plein d'anguilles"
John P. Dodge
Boeing Shared Services


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   "   from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to