On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Boyle Owen wrote: > > > > Is there a consensus on compiling mod_ssl as shared or static? > > It depends on your application which is the more appropriate. The two > possibilities are not provided just to add a bit of spice to life, they're > there because in some situations it makes more sense to compile-in a module > statically while in others it's better to load it at runtime. > > Think about what each entails and the pros and cons of each approach and then > consider your case and decide which is more appropriate. > > Rgds, > Owen Boyle > Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. > Thanks Owen,
The reason I am asking is that I have always compiled mod_ssl static and I am now getting feedback from a customer who indicates that the problems he is having related to SSLVerifyClient renegotiation are due to mod_ssl not being compiled static. He has a static compiled mod_ssl and indicates that this operation works fine but in the shared mod_ssl is does not. Somehow I can't see how this operational issue is related. Thanks again... ---------------------------------------- "Mon aéroglisseur est plein d'anguilles" John P. Dodge Boeing Shared Services --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
