If you add it into your ~/.sge_qstat then you will notice the difference...
Rayson On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Wagner, Justin <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps I am missing the point of this discussion, but we have no problem > defining a "-u *" in the $SGE_ROOT/$SGE_CELL/common/sge_qstat file which > shows all jobs for a normal qstat: > >> qstat > job-ID prior name user state submit/start at queue > slots ja-task-ID > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 195116 0.56000 irun k****m r 06/19/2012 12:55:56 > lt_sim_sindar@*.com 1 > 195186 0.55000 vlan_act2_ m**y r 06/19/2012 15:58:11 > lt_np_17@*.com 1 > 195192 0.54779 test_stbw_ jwagner r 06/19/2012 15:52:41 > lt_regress@*.com 1 > 195194 0.56000 quartus_sh jwagner r 06/19/2012 15:52:41 > dse_runs@*.com 1 > 195195 0.54779 test_stbw_ jwagner r 06/19/2012 15:52:41 > lt_regress@*.com 1 > 195197 0.54779 test_stbw_ jwagner r 06/19/2012 15:52:56 > lt_regress@*.com 1 > 195198 0.54779 test_stbw_ jwagner r 06/19/2012 15:52:56 > lt_regress@*.com 1 > 195200 0.54779 test_stbw_ jwagner r 06/19/2012 15:52:56 > lt_regress@*.com 1 > 195202 0.54779 test_stbw_ jwagner r 06/19/2012 15:52:56 > lt_regress@*.com 1 > 195187 0.55000 vlan_egres m**y qw 06/19/2012 15:16:20 > 1 > 195188 0.55000 vlan_ingre m**y qw 06/19/2012 15:16:21 > 1 > 195189 0.55000 test_summa m**y qw 06/19/2012 15:16:22 > 1 > > And it still allows the user to specify a specific user by adding a -u > themselves > >> qstat -u jwagner > job-ID prior name user state submit/start at queue > slots ja-task-ID > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 195192 0.54779 test_stbw_ jwagner r 06/19/2012 15:52:41 > lt_regress@*.com 1 > 195194 0.56000 quartus_sh jwagner r 06/19/2012 15:52:41 > dse_runs@*.com 1 > 195195 0.54779 test_stbw_ jwagner r 06/19/2012 15:52:41 > lt_regress@*.com 1 > 195197 0.54779 test_stbw_ jwagner r 06/19/2012 15:52:56 > lt_regress@*.com 1 > 195198 0.54779 test_stbw_ jwagner r 06/19/2012 15:52:56 > lt_regress@*.com 1 > 195200 0.54779 test_stbw_ jwagner r 06/19/2012 15:52:56 > lt_regress@*.com 1 > 195202 0.54779 test_stbw_ jwagner r 06/19/2012 15:52:56 > lt_regress@*.com 1 > > Just my two cents... > > Justin > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Kevin Buckley > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 3:22 PM > To: Dave Love > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [gridengine users] $SGE_ROOT/$SGE_CELL/common/sge_qstat > > On 19 June 2012 21:44, Dave Love <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Like similar options, the union of multiple -u arguments is taken, >> i.e. -u A -u B is equivalent to -u A,B and with * present, you get >> everything. I'm not sure it's worth the incompatibility and effort to >> change that in this case and any others where it might make sense. > > The issue here would seem to be that, wihout a "--no-u user1,user2" > equivalent, then having an admin force a "-u *" at the system level > just takes all control away, around that argument, from the user's level. > > If anything, the mantra should be that the system level directive control > should be used to take away capability, rather than add it to the default, > because the latter can alway be done at the user-level. > > Just another thre'pen'th though. > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
