I have no clue how my comment was rude, it's pretty standard in open source world to say that "patches welcome" or some variation.
I'm unsubscribing though as I don't have the time nor energy to continue this and you seem to have more than enough of both to go around. Enjoy ranting on the thread. Best, Joel On 10/03/2014 10:14 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 10/3/2014 12:25 PM, Tanstaafl <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 10/2/2014 3:11 PM, V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Charles S. (aka Tanstaafl) was given instructions >>> and has agreed to do what needs to be done and review the corrected function >>> for his use case with a current build of master (4.4.0alpha0+)--and respond >>> in the fdo#76565 >>> <https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76565> BZ issue >>> regards the UX regression. >> Fix confirmed (had some spare time this morning)... >> >> It was also mentioned in the bug that it would be back-ported to 4.3 > Also, I'm confused... > > Jan-Marek in the bug comment on August 17th - well before the 'Hard code > freeze' on September 1st for 4.3.2 (released on Sept 22nd - said that > the patch would show up in the daily builds after that. > > So, I'm not complaining, I'm just asking - can someone who understands > the dev process explain why this fix did not make it into 4.3.2? > > Thanks > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
