Hi :) How about as an add-on/Extension for Draw? Do we really need more bloat in Writer to make it into yet another image editor? I'm happier using dedicated programs and thus making the images available for use elsewhere and in other programs. Just because Word does something bad doesn't mean we have to follow. Part of the extra advantage of LibreOffice is that it works on low spec systems that MS Office can't cope with. Regards from Tom :)
On 28 February 2014 02:48, Dale Rebgetz <[email protected]> wrote: > On 28/02/2014 12:16 pm, Cley Faye wrote: >> >> I don't know how often this feature is requested for odt files. I know >> that for pdf you can set parameters for the image compression, and it make >> sense since the resulting file is unlikely to undergo future changes, but >> it's less obvious for file formats that are not at the "end" of the editing >> line. It's probably better to work with the "highest" resolution needed, and >> produce smaller files as needed. > > Fair point. However most documents reach a finished state, at which point > they do not need to stay bloated. > >> Hmm. As a "proof of concept", I put together a java program that take an >> odt file as input. You can then set the "requested" DPI and jpeg quality, >> and save. At this point, every pictures that are larger than needed (that's >> why we need DPI) are resized, and all pictures are compressed using either >> jpg or png, whichever gives the smalles size. Something as simple as that >> already have issues, like when there's transparency involved. Also, it's >> only tested on a few files (including >> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/9/96/WG40-WriterGuideLO.odt for >> funsies). If anyone want to give it a try here's the jar. It's highly >> unlikely to corrupt your source file (the source file is never ever >> written), but there's also no guarantee that the output will work ;) >> <http://cleyfaye.net/share/odtcompress.jar> For example, on the writer guide >> linked before, it goes from 13MB to 9MB with default settings. Of course >> it's not the best example: all pictures are already reasonably sized, and >> it's mostly screenshots so the quality drop is very noticeable... Anyway, if >> anyone want to look at the source code (without reversing the jar :D) I'll >> provide them. But know that it's mostly an ugly hack just to see how well it >> would work :) > > Cley, a good "proof of concept". It needs lots of work but certainly as a > concept it gains my approval. > > Dale. > > > > > > -------- > Email from setec.com.au does not necessarily represent the official > policy of SETEC Pty Ltd. > See http://www.setec.com.au/emaildisclaimer20060629.html for details. > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
