Hi :)
That comment looks like FUD to me.  Where are the links to substantiate his 
claims?  There is a lot of FUD about China at the moment.  Perhaps some is true 
but western journalism has it's own biases so getting at the truth is a tad 
tricky.  

Also it's not Cnet that are recommending Kingsoft.  It's only the author's 
opinion.  PLus it's got a question mark after it.  If you search through Cnet 
you will probably find similar claims in titles of articles about LibreOffice


This page in Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_office_suites
shows Kingsoft has been around since 1988 and is available for Windows and 
Gnu&Linux (incl Android).  LibreOffice's first release date is listed as 2010 
which just shows how tricky it is to adequately report on such things.  Many 
people would say the first release of LO is the same as OpenOffice and that 
should be the same as StarOffice's first release date over a decade ago.  I 
just had to do a little editing there myself but if you check the history you 
can see that the lines about Kingsoft have been unchanged for ages, possibly 
years.  


Regards from 

Tom :)  






>________________________________
> From: Kracked_P_P---webmaster <[email protected]>
>To: LibreO - Marketing Global <[email protected]>; LibreO - 
>Users Global <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Thursday, 6 June 2013, 19:48
>Subject: [libreoffice-users] CNET is claiming the best free MSO alternative is 
>not LO
> 
>
>
>I never even heard of this office packages company.
>
>If the commenter is correct, then CNET really need to rethink their 
>recommendations.
>
>-----------------------------
>
>
>http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33153_7-57587824-10391733/kingsoft-office-2013-the-best-free-microsoft-office-alternative/
>
>
>Kingsoft Office 2013: The best free Microsoft Office alternative?
>
>Not only does it have the best interface around, it also brings 
>innovations like tabbed document viewing and drag-and-drop paragraph 
>adjustment.
>Rick Broida
>by Rick Broida
>June 5, 2013 10:52 AM PDT
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>One of the replies to that article is as follows
>---------------
>
>the_brigadier
>25 minutes ago
>
>You do know Kingsoft is a communist Chinese company whose nation has 
>been conducting unrelenting hack attacks to strip America of all its 
>technology? If you can't build it, steal it is their credo. What better 
>way to open up a million backdoors then by offering free software that 
>exactly emulates Microsoft's flagship program.
>
>By the way read their EULA very carefully. IT CLEARLY STATES THAT 
>ANYTHING CREATED USING THEIR SOFTWARE BECOMES THE PROPERTY OF KINGSOFT.  
>Have you read it Karyn?  I downloaded this software several years ago 
>read that EULA and used Revo to deepscan uninstall that software. It had 
>put tendrils all through my computer. Revo is very good and got it all, 
>but don't be fooled.
>
>This is part and parcel to China's hacking attempts and for cnet to 
>recommend it is both incredibly naive and questionable at best.
>
>-- 
>To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
>Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
>All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
>
>
>
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to