Thanks for your response.
This makes me so glad that I do not upgrade anything immediately -
I'd rather wait until all the kinks are removed.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Tom Davies <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi :)
> Reason for so many problems in last couple of weeks is the new release of
> a new branch of LO.
>
> Each new branch should try to add as much functionality as it reasonably
> can to attract new people and to give the devs a chance to really show-off
> and get on with interesting things. Unfortunately the side-effect is that
> unexpected things and often completely unrelated things that 'shouldnt' be
> affected sometimes go wrong. Roughly the equivalent of going out to buy an
> ice-cream and getting back to find a magpie built a nest in your filing
> cabinet.
>
> As a branch matures the devs fix those problems (and longer-standing
> issues) and include their fixes in the "service packs". So 3.6.1 is likely
> to have less problems and then the 3.6.2 has even less and so on until it
> reaches around 3.6.4.
>
> But by then it has become less exciting to work on so a lot of the devs
> will have drifted over to new functionality that will be added in the next
> new branch. Not all devs want exciting new toys, many have a tendency to
> worry a specific problem to death but that can often become an unhealthy
> obsession too. A fresh pair of eyes can sometimes spot where a dev has
> managed to shake something loose and come up with a simpler answer.
>
> After months of detailed work on a specific issue a dev might then be into
> chasign shiny new toys for a while (or just leave the project and run
> screaming from the room). Hopefully people that chase shiny new toys
> sometimes get sucked into getting bogged down in a single issue again. For
> some people i would guess that's a repeating cycle.
>
> Of course many of the companies that support LO do invest employee
> dev-time into LO and they get a lot less choice about what they work on, so
> their burn-out rates are probably higher.
>
> Just my thoughts really. Any stereotype fails in the light of reality.
> Regards from
> Tom :)
>
>
>
>
> From: anne-ology <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Update to 3.6.1
> To: "Dan" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], "Tom" <[email protected]>
> Date: Thursday, 30 August, 2012, 22:47
>
> so I'm using both 32 & 64 on this machine ???
>
> ok, I believe you;
> now just another question -
> could this be the reason for so many bugs? -
> [seems as if this list has been listing quite a few
> recently, some I've never even seen ???]
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Dan
> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>
> I believe that Tom and I were talking about LibreOffice on Windows. I
> > have a 64 bit computer which had VISTA running until I replace that with
> > Ubuntu. But LO does not have a 64 bit LO version which I thought was the
> > train of thought.
> >
> > --Dan
> >
> > anne-ology wrote:
> >
> >> You've been mis-informed - WIN does have 64.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Dan
> >> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>wrote:
> >>
> >> As far as I know, only Windows does not have a 64 bit version.
> >> Linux has 64 bit version for both DEB and RPM. The following is the
> >> folder containing the installation files for LO 3.6.1.2 The Java I
> use
> >> is also 64 bit that I get from the Ubuntu Repository (OpenJDK Java
> 6)
> >> with all the patches.
> >>
> >> LibO_3.6.1.2_Linux_x86-64___**install-deb_en-US
> >>
> >> --Dan
> >>
> >>
> >> Tom Davies wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi :)
> >> LibreOffice doesn't have a 64bit version and allegedly needs
> java
> >> to be 32 bit too.
> >> Regards from
> >> Tom :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Peter Hillier-Brook
> >> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Update to 3.6.1
> >> To:
> >> [email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]><mailto:
> users@global.**
> >> libreoffice.org
> >> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
> >>
>
> >>
> >> Date: Wednesday, 29 August, 2012, 22:05
> >> On 29/08/12 18:50, Tom Davies wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi :) Errr, on the 64bit Ubuntu is the java also 64bit? If
> >> it is
> >> then can you try installing a 32 bit version of 1.6_32? LO
> >> can be
> >> told which version of java to use so it might work Tools -
> >> Options -
> >> Java Regards from Tom :)
> >>
> >>
> >> That sounds like Windows solution! :-)
> >>
> >> Peter HB
> >>
>
>
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
