On 22/12/2011, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions <[email protected]> wrote: > > What I do not like is when people tell others that if the files do not > come from their source, then they must [or implied that way] have > something "nasty" hidden inside. >
Such people are fully justified. Previously, someone made very serious recommendations about the poor level (i.e. synonymous with the m$ mentality) of security regarding the "service" you are providing: did you improve the security of your web site??? As for the assumption that web sites should be considered innocent until proven guilty: utter naive nonsense. Unless you can speak/see people ear-to-ear/eye-to-eye, only official sources should be used. By definition, those that want to disregard security are free to distribute open source software as they want (even charge for it), but there is no justification for official sources to acknowledge, support, endorse un-official sources. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
