In doing a bit of research for a previous post, I wanted to make a comparison to MS Office and some of the issues that the Documentation Foundation should look into to strengthen LO in the field.
Now, for full disclosure, I haven't used any MS program any more than when I absolutely had to (very occasionally; yes, I started with Word Perfect for DOS..) but I had no idea that that the MSO Suite was, and is, so evidently flawed!!! Here's but a few comparisons: http://www.brighthub.com/computing/linux/articles/54226.aspx http://www.itpro.co.uk/620845/head-to-head-office-2010-vs-open-office-3-1 http://www.linuxjournal.com/magazine/openofficeorg-vs-microsoft-office?page=0,0 http://www.techsoup.org/learningcenter/software/page4765.cfm Is Office 20xx really that bad? I mean I know how to "kill Clippy", but it's almost painful to read that it's not just "out of the box, onto the screen and onto paper" for them. It makes me a bit less opinionated a bit when I see some nagging flaws and glaring issues in OO, but as I see it, these should also be literal targets for the DF to use in developing LO in the near future! ----- Ubuntu 10.04 LTS & Windows XP-SP3 - (1) 2.8 G/2G RAM/ATI HD2600,512VRAM/SIS AC97 OB Audio (2) 2.9 G/3G RAM/NVIDIA 9500GT,1024VRAM/SB AudigySE Audio (3) 2.3 G/2G RAM/NVIDIA FX1500M,256VRAM/Sigmatel HD Aud -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/I-can-t-believe-this-Is-the-competition-is-really-this-bad-tp2445160p2445160.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
