I did not say it’s better than AIR. If ActionScript/swf/AIR is a good target, then I’m all for that.
If the target is HTML (for whatever reason), then CEF is a really good way to get HTML5 packaged as a native app. There’s lots of popular apps which use it. Brackets, Evernote, Macaw to name a few. If a large part of your app is a Web view, then CEF might be worth looking at instead of AIR. Modern Chromium is definitely better than the outdated Webkit included in AIR. On Nov 5, 2015, at 11:35 PM, jude <[email protected]> wrote: > Are these tools to package web applications into desktop applications? They > are better than AIR because newer embedded browser? > > On Thursday, November 5, 2015, Harbs <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If someone has the bandwidth to look into it, using CEF is probably a >> really good way to go.[1] >> >> [1]https://bitbucket.org/chromiumembedded/cef >> >> On Nov 5, 2015, at 3:23 PM, pkumar.flex <[email protected] >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >>> Using flexJs 0.0.2, i can compile flex application to JS but is there any >>> tool or way to package it for window or mac? as we have "adt" in Flex >>> SDk4.14.1 >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Prashant >>> Sr. Product Specialist, Sungard >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Desktop-Application-creation-using-FlexJS-AIR-tp11430.html >>> Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >>
