WORD ... nothing more to say !
[email protected] schrieb: >So the comment I have is that the runtime is very different and better than >interpreted html, by definition. That's why having the full runtime available >is so valuable with AIR and the Flash player on desktop and windows tablets. >The way the runtime works is totally different in terms of the full set of >libraries and packages and actionscript language but also the way rendering >takes place. So every object would be like a complete canvas of every feature >that a web browser offers and much more. So instead of individual xml >elements, div etc, being rendered out individually and separately with only a >given set of available properties, all objects in Flash can be modified at the >lowest rendering level and manipulated with any or all available objects or >packages. Similarly, all of this happens within a single layered environment >where objects are displayed transparently on one another. > >So all of the things on the most cutting edge of html today, web components, >es6, data binding, 3d context, CSS transitions and transformations etc, have >always been available in Flex and Flash and rendered in a much better, more >flexible, fully programmable pipeline that makes sense and is easy to use and >understand. > >The fact is that html will never be as good as the runtime because it simply >can't be because it's entire structure and rendering is completely different. >So the best options is for Flex content to basically be read and mapped out to >some corresponding html, which will function in its own constrained way. > >So an example of all of this would be once when I needed to a small graphic of >an arrow pointing down below a pop-up menu in Flex. I was able to target the >actual graphic object itself in actionscript and programmatically create a >vector object I wanted and attach it as a child to the parent object as a >single object oriented component. In html I would have to go to a lot of >trouble to create a bunch of nested elements and put in a separate svg element >or background image and have all sorts of cross browser issues and the concept >of layering the popup would be difficult and confusing. So in general >everything is just simpler, easier and completely better from a programming >perspective. > >That's what it's really all about, Flash is simply the better platform when >you look at it. However with the current state of the market we are all >probably having to work with html based Web apps as well in their own terms >and formats. At least I am ... If given and honest comparison and choice >though it's pretty obvious that Flash/Flex/Air are vastly superior, and they >always have been. > >David H. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jeffry Houser <[email protected]> >To: Gerald Hollinka <[email protected]>, [email protected] >Sent: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 11:58 AM >Subject: Re: The future of Adobe AIR is right? > > > I should have said "Existing Flex Skills"; I did not mean to say >existing Flex code. ;) > > You should thank Alex and the rest of the team. I'm just watching the >FlexJS stuff from the sidelines. > >On 7/25/2015 6:12 PM, Gerald Hollinka wrote: >> Hi Jeffry!! >> >> Your sentence >> "I believe FlexJS is functional and you'll be able to use your >> existing Flex in the transition to HTML(5) based apps." >> >> is not enough. Your are our heroe. >> So many developers all over the world believe in you. And all you >> could express is ... >> >> a very disappointent Gerry (Austria - Europe) >> >> ps: Your are still my heroe!!!!! >> >> >> >> 2015-07-25 17:58 GMT+02:00 Jeffry Houser <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >> >> For specific questions about Adobe AIR; you are going to have to >> ask Adobe. You may start by looking here: >> http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html . >> >> 64 bit support for Windows and Mac is listed. in the "New >> Features" section; but no AIR version for Linux has been released >> later than version 3. >> >> I believe FlexJS is functional and you'll be able to use your >> existing Flex in the transition to HTML(5) based apps. >> >> >> On 7/25/2015 10:06 AM, Udirley Otoni Pesse wrote: >> >> Hello, I have several applications in flex which until then >> were being >> executed by the browser, with the increasing bombing the flash >> player has >> been suffering I find it very hard that it lasts for a long >> time, and for >> this reason I'm switching to air adobe, so I no longer use the >> browser. >> But me there arise some questions, which assures me that Adobe >> will >> continue the AIR support? >> There site for dounload can only download for Windows 32 and >> Mac. What >> about Windows 64 and Linux. Am I following the right path? >> I have many time s work and I can not lose them. >> I have eagerly awaited by FlexJS, but I see that the project >> is still at a >> very high level of development and has little documentation. >> I'm being pressured to migrate to HTMH5 but I did not want to, >> I like the >> Flex, but I am employee in a company do not know how long I'll >> be able to >> hold. >> >> I need to make a decision soon, and your opinions will count a >> lot in this >> decision. >> Adobe AIR will be kept? This is a sure future? >> I migrate to AIR? >> You can now use FlexJS? >> >> In short ... I'm desperately trying to save years of work and >> my job. >> >> >> >> -- >> Jeffry Houser >> Technical Entrepreneur >> http://www.jeffryhouser.com >> 203-379-0773 <tel:203-379-0773> >> >> > > >-- >Jeffry Houser >Technical Entrepreneur >http://www.jeffryhouser.com >203-379-0773 >
