Hi Miguel, happy to hear that all's working now ... regarding these Properties. I have had quite a number of problem reports with this functionality. I think the testsuite should actually conatin quite some tests for this. But I'll have a look at it as soon as possible.
Chris ________________________________________ Von: Miguel Ferreira <[email protected]> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Mai 2014 15:47 An: [email protected] Betreff: RE: AW: AW: AW: flex compilation diferent from maven compilation Finally everything is compiling correctly i had just to put the memory up to 1500 and i think that what is consuming so much memory is the copy of resources i have to figure out how this can be improved because before was the same resources and the things we handled more quickly.. I just have a final question Chris :) In the new version of Flex mojos how can i Define properties? BEfore as something like this: <definesDeclaration> <property> <name>BUILD::buildNumber</name> <value>"${buildNumber}"</value> </property> <property> <name>BUILD::version</name> <value>"${buildVersion}"</value> </property> <property> <name>BUILD::buildRevision</name> <value>"${buildRevision}"</value> </property> <property> <name>CONFIG::DEBUG</name> <value>false</value> </property> </definesDeclaration> But now is not working. There is some change in the tag name? Thanks for your support was really helpful to keep going :) Miguel > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: AW: AW: AW: flex compilation diferent from maven compilation > Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 13:08:53 +0000 > > Hi Miguel, > > yes I have an Artifactory in which I have all the artifacts. But No, I can't > give you access to that. Aotherwise Adobe would probably start writing mad > letters to me ;-) > > What version of Flexmojos are you using? 6.x or 7.x? > > Chris > ________________________________________ > Von: Miguel Ferreira <[email protected]> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. Mai 2014 11:00 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: RE: AW: AW: flex compilation diferent from maven compilation > > Hi Chris, > Even related to the topic, > Do you have a Nexus Proxy were i can connect to have the correct dependencies > and the correct versions? > Because in the pom file i have the dependency of the flex compiler version > 4.6.0 but i only can find the dependency for the version 4.6.b.And is a > headache because i don't "control" the Nexus environment, but, a can tell the > Nexus team to open a Nexus proxy for this dependency and that will solve my > issue and also future dependencies problems where i can update always the > flexmojos without looking if the dependencies are correct or not. > > Thank you, > Miguel > > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: AW: AW: flex compilation diferent from maven compilation > > Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 11:13:56 +0000 > > > > Hi Miguel, > > > > You can have a look at my confluence ... here I documented a lot of stuff > > back in the days where I didn't have write Access to the Flexmojos Wiki: > > https://dev.c-ware.de/confluence/display/PUBLIC/Flexmojos+Section > > Especially this article should be a good starting point: > > https://dev.c-ware.de/confluence/display/PUBLIC/Configuring+your+poms > > But I currently do see that these pages could use an update to the latest > > Flexmojos and Apache Flex versions. > > > > Just come back if you have any problems. > > > > Chris > > > > ________________________________________ > > Von: Miguel Ferreira <[email protected]> > > Gesendet: Montag, 5. Mai 2014 12:04 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: RE: AW: flex compilation diferent from maven compilation > > > > Hi Chris, > > I was waiting for your response! > > I enter in this project and a lot of libraries and etc are 1000 years old > > because i did not know Maven i let it be quiet there but in this moment i > > was already reading and trying to update this historical version to a > > update one :) > > Thanks for the links i will give it a try. > > Miguel > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: AW: flex compilation diferent from maven compilation > > > Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 09:35:15 +0000 > > > > > > Hi Miguel, > > > > > > well Flexmojos 3.6.1 is about 1000 Years old :-) It's not at all capable > > > of compiling with Apache Flex versions. If you want to use Apache Flex > > > releases you have to upgrade to Flexmojos 7.0.0 and currently you have to > > > create the Mavenized version of the Flex SDK by using our cool Mavenizer > > > tool: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Apache+Flex+SDK+Mavenizer > > > > > > Flexmojos also has a new GroupId strarting from verion 5.x: > > > net.oss.flexmojos. I think having a look at this document is a good > > > starting point: > > > https://flexmojos.atlassian.net/wiki/display/FLEXMOJOS/Migrating+to+6.x > > > > > > The only main difference between Flexmojos 6 and 7 is that the Flex SDK > > > now has the group Id org.apache.flex instead of com.adobe.flex. > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > > Von: Miguel Ferreira <[email protected]> > > > Gesendet: Montag, 5. Mai 2014 11:20 > > > An: [email protected] > > > Betreff: flex compilation diferent from maven compilation > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Last week i developed some menu items for the context menu in a flex > > > application. > > > When i compile it with FB 4.7 every option is show without any problem > > > but when i compile with maven the context menu is always the default one? > > > > > > I am using SDK 4.10.flash version 10.0.45 > > > > > > <properties> <flex.version>4.10.0.20130801</flex.version> > > > <flexmojos.version>3.6.1</flexmojos.version> > > > <flash.version>10.0.45</flash.version> > > > <playerglobal.version>11.8</playerglobal.version> > > > <flexlib.classifier>flex3</flexlib.classifier> > > > <target.dir>target</target.dir> </properties> > > > I am quite new with maven. > > > I can see that is a old version of flex mojos. Is that the solution? to > > > update to the most recent. > > > Or the compiler have to have some extra argument? > > > Thank you in advance for some feedback. > > > Miguel.
