GitHub user wverleger created a discussion: Almalinux 9.6 - UEFI Secure/Legacy
Boot
Hi,
using: ACS 4.19.3.0
I was wondering if there is any limitation with Alma Linux 9.6 and UEFI
Secure/Legacy Boot?
Trying to create/start a VM results in a error message:
**UI**
`
Unable to start a VM [0ac37123-6419-4987-92f8-313077c988c6] due to [Unable to
create a deployment for VM instance
{"id":1196,"instanceName":"i-50-1196-VM","state":"Starting","type":"User","uuid":"0ac37123-6419-4987-92f8-313077c988c6"}].`
**MGMT Logs**
`2025-08-19 15:39:00,366 ERROR [c.c.v.VmWorkJobDispatcher]
(Work-Job-Executor-115:ctx-988407c7 job-48552/job-48554) (logid:2bb20fa8)
Unable to complete AsyncJobVO: {id:48554, userId: 102, accountId: 50,
instanceType: null, instanceId: null, cmd: com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart, cmdInfo:
rO0ABXNyABhjb20uY2xvdWQudm0uVm1Xb3JrU3RhcnR9cMGsvxz73gIAC0oABGRjSWRMAAZhdm9pZHN0ADBMY29tL2Nsb3VkL2RlcGxveS9EZXBsb3ltZW50UGxhbm5lciRFeGNsdWRlTGlzdDtMAAljbHVzdGVySWR0ABBMamF2YS9sYW5nL0xvbmc7TAAGaG9zdElkcQB-AAJMAAtqb3VybmFsTmFtZXQAEkxqYXZhL2xhbmcvU3RyaW5nO0wAEXBoeXNpY2FsTmV0d29ya0lkcQB-AAJMAAdwbGFubmVycQB-AANMAAVwb2RJZHEAfgACTAAGcG9vbElkcQB-AAJMAAlyYXdQYXJhbXN0AA9MamF2YS91dGlsL01hcDtMAA1yZXNlcnZhdGlvbklkcQB-AAN4cgATY29tLmNsb3VkLnZtLlZtV29ya5-ZtlbwJWdrAgAESgAJYWNjb3VudElkSgAGdXNlcklkSgAEdm1JZEwAC2hhbmRsZXJOYW1lcQB-AAN4cAAAAAAAAAAyAAAAAAAAAGYAAAAAAAAErHQAGVZpcnR1YWxNYWNoaW5lTWFuYWdlckltcGwAAAAAAAAAAHBwcHBwcHBwc3IAEWphdmEudXRpbC5IYXNoTWFwBQfawcMWYNEDAAJGAApsb2FkRmFjdG9ySQAJdGhyZXNob2xkeHA_QAAAAAAADHcIAAAAEAAAAAR0A
ApWbVBhc3N3b3JkdAAfck8wQUJYUUFFRGhTWkZOWFJEUkNabGgzVTFwUVpuZ3QACEJvb3RNb2RldAASck8wQUJYUUFCbE5GUTFWU1JRdAAIQm9vdFR5cGV0AA9yTzBBQlhRQUJGVkZSa2t0AAhVZWZpRmxhZ3QADnJPMEFCWFFBQTFsbGN3eHA,
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result:
null, initMsid: 165989263229575, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null,
lastPolled: null, created: Tue Aug 19 15:38:47 CEST 2025, removed: null}, job
origin:48552
com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a
deployment for VM instance
{"id":1196,"instanceName":"i-50-1196-VM","state":"Starting","type":"User","uuid":"0ac37123-6419-4987-92f8-313077c988c6"}Scope=interface
com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1239)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:5496)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor994.invoke(Unknown
Source)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at
com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.java:105)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:5620)
at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:654)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:48)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:55)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:102)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:52)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:45)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:602)
at
java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at
java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
at
java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)`
[cs_logs.txt](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/21856835/cs_logs.txt)
(more logs attached)
Hosts support UEFI:
<img width="212" height="62" alt="grafik"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/298bce68-e084-43ad-af2f-94fd7a278eac";
/>
Cloudstack Agent settings:
guest.nvram.template.secure=/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_VARS_4M.ms.fd
guest.nvram.template.legacy=/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_VARS_4M.fd
guest.nvram.path=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/nvram/
guest.loader.secure=/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_CODE_4M.secboot.fd
guest.loader.legacy=/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_CODE_4M.fd
The same setup using Ubuntu 24 LTS as hypervisors works out of the box.
GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/11477
----
This is an automatically sent email for users@cloudstack.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: users-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org
