Gary - Yeah. It was set to "Online Shared" on my 2022 template. I ran into
that same issue with the Windows recovery partition and had to play the
same partition games as well.

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 2:11 AM Gary Dixon <[email protected]>
wrote:

> No worries
>
> I think by default it is set to OfflineAll
>
> I see in your reply to Wei that you mention also you use Server 2022 -
> bear in mind Microsoft changed the OS disk partitioning scheme in Windows
> 10/11 and Server 2022 and now puts the recovery partition at the end of the
> disk. On our Windows server 2022 template we have made it so the recovery
> partition is at the beginning of the disk so that you still have the
> ability to expand the C drive in the future if you need to.
>
> Ref:
> https://superuser.com/questions/1453790/how-to-move-the-recovery-partition-on-windows-10
>
> BR
>
> Gary
>
>
> Gary Dixon​​​​
> Quadris Cloud Manager
> 0161 537 4980 <0161%20537%204980>
>  +44 7989717661 <+44%207989717661>
> [email protected]
> www.quadris.com
> Innovation House, 12‑13 Bredbury Business Park
> Bredbury Park Way, Bredbury, Stockport, SK6 2SN
> -----Original Message-----
> From: S.Fuller <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 6:58 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Hot Added NICs - PCI slot changes on instance reboot
>
> Gary,
>
> Thanks for chiming in. I'll check the SAN policy on and see what it is set
> to.
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:55 AM Gary Dixon
> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve
> >
> > I don't know about the hot-add nic issue - but with the volumes on
> > windows guests you need to set the SAN policy to OnlineAll in diskpart
> > - then additional volumes will always be available (we bake this into
> > our windows
> > templates)
> > Ref:
> > https://lear/
> > n.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows-server%2Fadministration%2Fwindows-co
> > mmands%2Fsan&data=05%7C02%7CGary.Dixon%40quadris.co.uk%7Cf3bdc0b8e4464
> > a9662e608dc1d0e73cf%7Cf1d6abf3d3b44894ae16db0fb93a96a2%7C0%7C0%7C63841
> > 7195111998648%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2lu
> > MzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=095UW0PnIp6Xl
> > vhqdlK8zVV3DsRQLwUqj2DI1im3rH4%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > BR
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > Gary Dixon​​​​
> > Quadris Cloud Manager
> > 0161 537 4980 <0161%20537%204980>
> > +44 7989717661 <+44%207989717661>
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.q/
> > uadris.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7CGary.Dixon%40quadris.co.uk%7Cf3bdc0b8e446
> > 4a9662e608dc1d0e73cf%7Cf1d6abf3d3b44894ae16db0fb93a96a2%7C0%7C0%7C6384
> > 17195112010357%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2l
> > uMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=aGZJHEFXbBID
> > 7Yx68x3dVN6F9StkB%2F0CP3hRNUbKTs4%3D&reserved=0
> > Innovation House, 12‑13 Bredbury Business Park Bredbury Park Way,
> > Bredbury, Stockport, SK6 2SN -----Original Message-----
> > From: S.Fuller <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 3:04 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Hot Added NICs - PCI slot changes on instance reboot
> >
> > I am running Cloudstack 4.11 and have encountered an issue with hot
> > added NICs on Windows guests. I add the NIC to a running guest,
> > configure it, and it works as expected. After the guest reboots, the
> > NIC is assigned to a different PCI slot, and then needs to be
> > reconfigured. This has caused issues when those hot-added network
> interfaces are used for ISCSI traffic.
> >
> > I can see the slot reassignment in both Windows and in the XML when I
> > do a virsh dumpxml on the guest. I've also seen this behavior when hot
> > adding volumes. That sometimes results in the volumes being in an
> > offline state when the guest restarts. We can bring them online
> > manually, and all of the data is there.
> >
> > I assume someone else has encountered this. If so, have you worked
> > around it somehow? For now, we're going to add interfaces and volumes
> > only when the guest is powered off, but that does make things a bit more
> work.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Steve Fuller
> > [email protected]
> >
>
>
> --
> Steve Fuller
> [email protected]
>


-- 
Steve Fuller
[email protected]

Reply via email to