You can find the private gateways in table "vpc_gateways" The issue is probably because some gateways or their corresponding networks are not removed (removed field in null).
-Wei On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 10:40, Gary Dixon <[email protected]> wrote: > ACS 4.14.2 > > > > KVM on ubuntu 20.04 hosts > > Adv Zone with no SG’s > > > > Hi all > > > > I restarted a redundant VPC with cleanup yesterday so the RVR’s could pick > up a new service offering with more RAM and CPU. > > > > I noticed that 2 of the interfaces were for the same Private gateway > network eth2 and eth5 (and the same on the other VPC that this private > gateway links to in the same Cloudstack environment) – checked other > tenants RVR’s that utilise a private gateway and they have just the one > interface as usual. > > > > These are the interfaces: > > > > Network > > 6 NIC(s) > > eth0 169.254.18.111 > > eth1 45.130.45.224 (PUBLIC) > > eth2 172.26.0.2 (vpc-PLS_VPC-privateNetwork) > > eth3 172.24.1.38 (172.24.1.0/24 - SERVERS) > > eth4 172.24.3.202 (DMZ_172.24.3.0/24) > > eth5 172.26.0.4 (vpc-PLS_VPC-privateNetwork) > > > > Seems this is possibly a bug where a previously deleted PG is not fully > gone and re-appears as a second interface on the RVR ? > > > > Is there a way I can remove this extra PG config somewhere – perhaps in a > DB table ? > > > > BR > > > > Gary > > > > > Gary Dixon > Senior Technical Consultant > T: +44 161 537 4990 > E: v <+44%207989717661>ms@quadris‑support.com > W: www.quadris.co.uk > The information contained in this e-mail from Quadris may be confidential > and privileged for the private use of the named recipient. The contents of > this e-mail may not necessarily represent the official views of Quadris. > If you have received this information in error you must not copy, > distribute or take any action or reliance on its contents. Please destroy > any hard copies and delete this message. >
