Hi Pratik, Thanks for the response.
Just to confirm, your storage volumes had zero downtime, right? Regards, Bryan On 19 Oct 2023 at 3:18 PM +0800, [email protected], wrote: > Hey Pratik, > > can you elaborate more on this stability problems? We are doing also a CS + > Linstor PoC at the moment and we did a lot of stress testing it without any > problems on linstor side. I am curious if we did miss some tests. > We are using a place count of 2 in a 3 node cluster. > > Regards, > Swen > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Pratik Chandrakar <[email protected]> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2023 07:15 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: Comparing Hyperconverged + Converged Setup with Cloudstack + > Linbit > > Hi Bryan, > > We did a small PoC with Cloudstack + Linbit SDS(3 Time replica) in a > hyperconverged setup. There was no issue with HA, the VMs successfully > restarted from different nodes. However, we did face stability problems with > Linbit HA, which prevented us from provisioning new storage or virtual > machines. > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 3:42 PM Bryan Tiang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > We are doing some evaluation with Cloudstack + Linbit SDS. > > > > Has anyone had any experience using these with a Converged or > > Hyperconverged setup? > > > > My understanding is that Converged is the best for HA Because: > > > > • If any storage node goes down, there is zero downtime. (3 Time > > Replica) • If any compute node goes down, it will be restarted in > > another node as part of HA feature. > > > > But what about Hyperconverged setup? Can we also set zero downtime > > with storage and fast VM recovery? > > > > Regards, > > Bryan > > > > > -- > *Regards,* > *Pratik Chandrakar* > >
