Thanks for the quick response! Strange that I didn't find that issue myself. But it's nice to know it is a known bug.
//Emil On Tue, Apr 11, 2023, 18:49 [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Take a look into this issue report > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6744 > > Emil Karlsson <[email protected]> schrieb am Di., 11. Apr. 2023, 22:56: > > > Hi all, > > > > I recently updated some of my machines to Ubuntu 22.04 from 20.04, and I > > noticed that some larger VMs are unable to start. As strange as it > sounds, > > a VM successfully boots on a 2 core 2Ghz CPU, but it does not when using > 16 > > core, same clock rate. > > > > libvirtd logs: > > error from service: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.InvalidArgs: > > *Value > > specified in CPUWeight is out of range* > > > > which leads me to this forum: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950301 > > > > that indicates that this has to do with a value in the KVM xml file. > > Specifically > > <cputune> > > <shares>*this value*</shares> > > .... > > </cputune> > > > > So, it seems as if Cloudstack is giving an invalid value here. > > > > According to: > > > > > https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#:~:text=.%20Since%201.2.9-,shares,262144%5D%20using%20cgroups%20v1%2C%20%5B1%2C%2010000%5D%20using%20cgroups%20v2.%20Since%200.9.0,-period > > > > the allowed values for cputune/shares differ depending on *cgroups > > version:* > > *v1* [2, 262144] > > *v2* [1, 10000] > > > > I believe Ubuntu 22.04 upgrades to *cgroups v2* (or at least somewhere > > between 20.04 -> 22.04). > > > > Which leads me to my question, does Cloudstack in some way assume that > the > > hosts use cgroups v1? > > > > I might have been misled somewhere when researching this issue, so any > > input would be greatly appreciated! > > > > Best regards, > > Emil Karlsson > > kthcloud > > >
