No - I don't believe anyone responded back with my inquiry.  As I stated in my 
email the latest on a VMware VDS is from version 4.11 and was wondering if 
compatibility/supportability has changed over the recent versions of either 
Apache CloudStack and/or VMware.

Thanks!

Mike



-----Original Message-----
From: Andrija Panic <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 4:10 PM
To: users <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: VMware VDS Updates on 4.15?

Hi Mike,

I believe you got the answers elsewhere, am I right?

Best,

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 at 21:19, Corey, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’m looking into using VMware Virtual Distributed Switches with my next
> lab build.  Has there been any new developments on using the VDS with
> CloudStack?  The latest info seems to be in the 4.11 notes, snippet below.
> If I’m looking at this correctly, I cannot have my NFS Storage network on
> the VDS…is that still the case with 4.15?
>
>
>
> Prerequisites and Guidelines
>
>    - VMware VDS is supported only on Public and Guest traffic in
>    CloudStack.
>    - VMware VDS does not support multiple VDS per traffic type. If a user
>    has many VDS switches, only one can be used for Guest traffic and another
>    one for Public traffic.
>    - Additional switches of any type can be added for each cluster in the
>    same zone. While adding the clusters with different switch type, traffic
>    labels is overridden at the cluster level.
>    - Management and Storage network does not support VDS. Therefore, use
>    Standard Switch for these networks.
>    - When you remove a guest network, the corresponding dvportgroup will
>    not be removed on the vCenter. You must manually delete them on the 
> vCenter.
>
>
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Mike Corey*
>
>
> Technology Senior Consultant, IT CS CTW Operation & Virtualization Service
> US
>
>
> *SAP AMERICA, INC.* 3999 West Chester Pike, Newtown Square, 19073 United
> States
>
>
> T +1 610 661 0905, M +1 484 274 2658, E [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

Andrija Panić

Reply via email to