Not recommended mainly because it generate some weird routing problem...
from your test, check your routing table on your CVM: Same subnet on
different interfaces... ( eth1 and eth2 )
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
0.0.0.0 172.26.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth2
8.8.4.4 172.26.0.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth1
8.8.8.8 172.26.0.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
172.26.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
172.26.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth2
Depending on your router, what you can do is to divide your
172.26.0.0/24 in 2...
Public on 172.26.0.0/25, gateway on your router: 172.26.0.1
Management on 172.26.0.128/25, gateway on your router: 172.26.0.129
On 2020-04-07 8:54 AM, F5 wrote:
Yes, is this configuration not allowed?
How could I get around this, as I don't have another routed network.
