+1 

I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was successful, I’ve 
also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation and it was looking good. 

Regards, 
Bobby.


[email protected] 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 

> On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles.
> 
> Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04
> Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04
> - create/use/delete system and user VMs
> - register new template
> - register service offering
> - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove)
> 
> Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike <
> [email protected]> escreveu:
> 
>> Thanks, Rohit!
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Rohit Yadav <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,
>> 
>> 
>> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and
>> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a
>> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of
>> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I
>> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic
>> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue:
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031
>> 
>> 
>> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this
>> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.
>> 
>> 
>> - Rohit
>> 
>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Tutkowski, Mike <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>> 
>> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s
>> still supported in CS 4.11.
>> 
>> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.
>> 
>> On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
>> I'll fire a similar build in out lab.
>> 
>> 
>> [email protected]
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
>> @shapeblue
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tutkowski, Mike <[email protected]>
>> Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>> 
>> Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up
>> fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see
>> it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in
>> cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management
>> server?
>> 
>> On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess
>> that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware...
>> have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
>> I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
>> Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the
>> vCenter console what do you see?
>> 
>> [email protected]
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
>> @shapeblue
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tutkowski, Mike <[email protected]>
>> Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>> 
>> I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully.
>> 
>> I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the
>> system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.
>> 
>> I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the
>> GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade
>> the template, the operation fails.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for
>> testing and a vote:
>> 
>> 
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> 
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
>> Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681
>> 
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/
>> 
>> PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>> 
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.
>> 
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>> 
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> 
>> Additional information:
>> 
>> For users' convenience, I've built packages from
>> 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/
>> 
>> The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template
>> upgrade section has been updated.
>> 
>> 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/
>> 
>> Only the following changes have been added to RC5:
>> 
>> 
>> +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
>> | Version | Github | Type | Priority | Description |
>> 
>> +=========================+==========+===============+==========+============================================================+
>> | 4.11.2.0 | `#3018`_ | | | Prevent error on GroupAnswers on VR creation |
>> 
>> +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
>> | 4.11.2.0 | `#3007`_ | | | Add missing ConfigDrive entries on existing
>> zones after |
>> | | | | | upgrade |
>> 
>> +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
>> | 4.11.2.0 | `#2980`_ | | | [4.11] Fix set initial reservation on public
>> IP ranges |
>> 
>> +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
>> | 4.11.2.0 | `#3010`_ | | | Fix DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for
>> lowercase |
>> | | | | | isolation methods |
>> 
>> +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
>> 
>> .. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012
>> .. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018
>> .. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007
>> .. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980
>> .. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> Paul Angus
>> 
>> 
>> [email protected]
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
>> @shapeblue
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [email protected]
>> www.shapeblue.com
>> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
>> @shapeblue
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to