Thanks for your answer, Paul! VPC would be nice, but it's not working together with security groups, correct me if I'm wrong...
Regards, Adrian On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 9:21 PM Paul Angus <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > An advanced zone with security groups is similar to a basic network in > that it doesn’t really have the concept of multiple networks for any given > VM. The security groups themselves create pseudo networks. > > You can create either a shared network on the vlan that you want to access > - where CloudStack allocates IPs and sets the gateway or an L2 network with > a 3rd party DHCP in place. > > There is also the option of using the private gateway feature of VPCs. > > [email protected] > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: S. Reddit <[email protected]> > Sent: 11 July 2018 08:37 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Advanced Zone with Security Groups > > Hi Group > > I am testing with an advanced zone and security group enabled networks > (KVM based). So far it works fine, but for the following features: > > - attach 2nd network to instance: > => security group(s) do not get programmed on secondary vnetXY interfaces, > hence no communication over additional network is possible > > As the zone prevents me from adding a network without security group > feature, it seems such a setup is not supported, correct? Does anyone see a > way to give instances access to a private network? Could L2-network from > 4.11 be a solution? I am still running 4.9... > > Cheers, > Adrian >
