Everything seems to be normal at a first glance. Do you see some sort of error in the log files?
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Jon Marshall <[email protected]> wrote: > CS version 4.11 > > VM HA at the moment (not Host HA as yet) > > KVM > > > For the management node just one NIC - 172.30.3.2/26 assigned to physical > NIC. > > > For the compute nodes - > > > 3 NICs so as an example from one compute node - > > > ifcfg-eth0 > > BRIDGE=cloudbr0 > > > ifcfg-eth1 > > BRIDGE=cloudbr1 > > > ifcfg-eth2 > > BRIDGE=cloudbr2 > > > then the 3 bridges - > > > ifcfg-cloudbr0 > > ip address 172.30.3.3/26 <--- management network > > > if-cloudbr1 > > ip address 172.30.4.3/25 <-- guest traffic > > gateway 172.30.4.1 > > > > ifcfg-cloubr2 > > ip address 172.30.5.3 /28 <-- storage traffic > > > traffic labels would be cloudbr0, cloudbr1, cloudbr2 > > > Can only get failover working when I put all traffic on same NIC. > > > > ________________________________ > From: Rafael Weingärtner <[email protected]> > Sent: 04 June 2018 15:31 > To: users > Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs > > What type of failover are you talking about? > What version are you using? > What hypervisor are you using? > How are you configuring your NICs in the hypervisor? > How are you configuring the traffic labels in ACS? > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Jon Marshall <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > > > I am close to giving up on basic networking as I just cannot get failover > > working with multiple NICs (I am not even sure it is supported). > > > > > > What I would like is to use 3 NICs for management, storage and guest > > traffic. I would like to assign public IPs direct to the VMs which is > why I > > originally chose basic. > > > > > > If I switch to advanced networking do I just configure a guest VM with > > public IPs on one NIC and not both with the public traffic - > > > > > > would this work ? > > > > > > -- > Rafael Weingärtner > -- Rafael Weingärtner
