Thank you, Dag!
Wouldn't it damage the existing records?
I have the following one in the `vm_template` table:
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 3
unique_name: routing-3
name: SystemVM Template (KVM)
uuid: b51f9ef8-bd2f-11e6-b74f-06973a00088a
public: 0
featured: 0
type: SYSTEM
hvm: 0
bits: 64
url:
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.6/systemvm64template-4.6.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2
format: QCOW2
created: 2016-12-08 12:18:48
removed: NULL
account_id: 1
checksum: c059b0d051e0cd6fbe9d5d4fc40c7e5d
display_text: SystemVM Template (KVM)
enable_password: 0
enable_sshkey: 0
guest_os_id: 15
bootable: 1
prepopulate: 0
cross_zones: 1
extractable: 0
hypervisor_type: KVM
source_template_id: NULL
template_tag: NULL
sort_key: 0
size: 322954240
state: Active
update_count: 0
updated: NULL
dynamically_scalable: 0
And also there are 2 ones in the `template_store_ref` table:
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 41
store_id: 1
template_id: 3
created: 2016-12-08 11:45:54
last_updated: 2018-04-01 19:25:34
job_id: NULL
download_pct: 100
size: 322954240
store_role: Image
physical_size: 322954240
download_state: DOWNLOADED
error_str: NULL
local_path: NULL
install_path:
template/tmpl/1/3/612564dc-8119-4c58-ae4c-df965ee99447.qcow2
url:
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.6/systemvm64template-4.6.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2
state: Ready
destroyed: 0
is_copy: 0
update_count: 0
ref_cnt: 0
updated: NULL
download_url_created: 1970-01-01 00:00:00
download_url: NULL
*************************** 2. row ***************************
id: 4151
store_id: 41
template_id: 3
created: 2018-04-02 14:43:49
last_updated: 2018-04-02 14:43:49
job_id: NULL
download_pct: 100
size: 0
store_role: Image
physical_size: 0
download_state: DOWNLOADED
error_str: NULL
local_path: NULL
install_path: template/tmpl/1/3/
url:
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.6/systemvm64template-4.6.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2
state: Ready
destroyed: 0
is_copy: 0
update_count: 0
ref_cnt: 0
updated: NULL
download_url_created: NULL
download_url: NULL
Maybe it's stupid, but I'm afraid that the script will make changes to the
record #41 instead of updating the record #4151. How will it know that we need
to install the template to the store #41 (a new secondary storage of a new
zone)?
Best regards,
Vlad
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 03:42:38PM +0000, Dag Sonstebo wrote:
> Vladimir,
>
> Secondary storage is always zone wide, and if you have multiple zones then
> you also select which zone to add the new secondary storage pool to.
> So as long as you prepopulate the template as per documentation you will be
> fine.
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 02/04/2018, 16:37, "Vladimir Melnik" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It might be a bit stupid question, but I'd like to ask for some help :)
>
> How to add a new SystemVM template to a new zone? The documentation
> (http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/4.9/management-server/_systemvm.html)
> is quite clear, but I can't see how will ACS understand that the template is
> being added to a new zone. Should I indicate the zone's ID somehow? How to do
> that?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> --
> V.Melnik
>
>
>
> [email protected]
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
--
V.Melnik
