+1 Much much better than the current one. More information on the screen. I have only one remark : "Notes" -- white text in blue box is readable, but links to document sections are almost not visible at all. Light-green is probably wrong colour for them.
Vadim. -----Original Message----- From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 3:26 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation theme remastered: http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ Join our webinar introducing cloud.ca - Canada's cloud infrastructure - on April 17th *Register now >> <https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/717597728964573442>* On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Apr 6, 2015, at 7:29 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, I've tried a new theme for cloudstack documentation and I'd > > like to have comments, feedback on if I should go forward with this. > > I've tested > a > > boostrap theme to fix following problems with the existing documentation: > > > > - 2 level of titles on the sidebar > > - tables does not fit into page width > > - page width is fixed > > > > here is the test site: > > http://acs-inst-testsite.readthedocs.org/en/new-theme/index.html > > table example: > > > http://acs-inst-testsite.readthedocs.org/en/new-theme/choosing_deploym > ent_architecture.html#choosing-a-hypervisor > > > > This theme is embedded into the git repo, so it would be easier to > > customize it the way we want compare the the RTD one. > > > > Please comments, > > > > PL > > +1 > > Not a fan of the green over blue (for the URLs). But I say got for it > merge, and then we can work off of that. > > > -sebastien > >
