And that would include VR as well?  Not just ssvm and cpvm?  :(
I am in advance zone.
Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone


---- Nux! wrote ----

Sonali,

4.4 to 4.5 requires upgrade of all system vms which will impact your uptime 
(unless you're in a Basic zone).

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sonali Jadhav" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, 3 March, 2015 13:47:48
> Subject: RE: CloudStack 4.5 release

> One small doubt, would there be any changes which can cause disturbance to
> existing instances or VRs ?
>
> Want to know since I have one big customer to move into CloudStack, so I can
> postpone it accordingly. I am running 4.4.2.
>
> /Sonali
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nux! [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:13 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: CloudStack 4.5 release
>
> Hello Sonali,
>
> It's not long now, I think one more RC and it's good. Don't take my word for 
> it,
> but I'd expect it in 2-3 weeks.
>
> HTH
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Sonali Jadhav" <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Thursday, 26 February, 2015 14:07:36
>> Subject: CloudStack 4.5 release
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When CloudStack 4.5 release is coming?
>>
>> Yours sincerely,
>>
>> Sonali Jadhav | Cloud Administrator
>> Nordiska Servercentralen
>> Skype ID: sonali.jadhav.sj
>> E-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>> Nordiska Servercentralen AB
>> Snövitsvägen 5
>> S-167 62 Bromma | Sweden
>> www.servercentralen.se<http://www.servercentralen.se/<http://www.servercentralen.se<http://www.servercentralen.se/>>
>> Incredible Servercentral Pvt. Ltd.
>> 202, Siddhivinayak Aurum, Near Hyatt Regency Behind Eden Garden, Viman
>> Nagar, 411 014 | Pune, India
> > www.servercentral.in<http://www.servercentral.in/<http://www.servercentral.in<http://www.servercentral.in/>>


Reply via email to