I have observed this kind of problems ("process blocked for more than xx
sec...") when I had access with storage - check your disks,  smartctl etc...
best

Sent from Google Nexus 4
On May 22, 2014 7:49 PM, "Ian Young" <[email protected]> wrote:

> And this is in /var/log/messages right before that event:
>
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: INFO: task qemu-kvm:2971 blocked for more
> than 120 seconds.
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel:      Not tainted
> 2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.x86_64 #1
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: "echo 0 >
> /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: qemu-kvm      D 0000000000000002     0
>  2971      1 0x00000080
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: ffff8810724e9be8 0000000000000082
> 0000000000000000 ffff88106b6529d8
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: ffff880871b3e8d8 ffff880871b3e8f0
> ffffffff8100bb8e ffff8810724e9be8
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: ffff881073525058 ffff8810724e9fd8
> 000000000000fbc8 ffff881073525058
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: Call Trace:
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffff8100bb8e>] ?
> apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffff810555ef>] ?
> mutex_spin_on_owner+0x9f/0xc0
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffff8152969e>]
> __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x13e/0x180
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffff8152953b>] mutex_lock+0x2b/0x50
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffffa021c2cf>]
> memory_access_ok+0x7f/0xc0 [vhost_net]
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffffa021d89c>]
> vhost_dev_ioctl+0x2ec/0xa50 [vhost_net]
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffffa021c411>] ?
> vhost_work_flush+0xe1/0x120 [vhost_net]
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffff8122db91>] ?
> avc_has_perm+0x71/0x90
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffffa021f11a>]
> vhost_net_ioctl+0x7a/0x5d0 [vhost_net]
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffff8122f914>] ?
> inode_has_perm+0x54/0xa0
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffffa01a28b7>] ?
> kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x1e7/0x580 [kvm]
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffff8108b14e>] ?
> send_signal+0x3e/0x90
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffff8119dc12>] vfs_ioctl+0x22/0xa0
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffff8119ddb4>]
> do_vfs_ioctl+0x84/0x580
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffff8119e331>] sys_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffff810e1e4e>] ?
> __audit_syscall_exit+0x25e/0x290
> May 22 10:16:07 virthost1 kernel: [<ffffffff8100b072>]
> system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Ian Young <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > The console proxy became unavailable again yesterday afternoon.  I could
> > SSH into it via its link local address and nothing seemed to be wrong
> > inside the VM itself.  However, the qemu-kvm process for that VM was at
> > almost 100% CPU.  Inside the VM, the CPU usage was minimal and the java
> > process was running and listening on port 443.  So there seems to be
> > something wrong with it down at the KVM/QEMU level.  It's weird how this
> > keeps happening to the console proxy only and not any of the other VMs.
>  I
> > tried to reboot it from the management UI and after about 15 minutes, it
> > finally did.  Now the console proxy is working but I don't know how long
> it
> > will last before it breaks again.  I found this in libvirtd.log, which
> > corresponds with the time the console proxy rebooted:
> >
> > 2014-05-22 17:17:04.362+0000: 25195: info : libvirt version: 0.10.2,
> > package: 29.el6_5.7 (CentOS BuildSystem <http://bugs.centos.org>,
> > 2014-04-07-07:42:04, c6b9.bsys.dev.centos.org)
> > 2014-05-22 17:17:04.362+0000: 25195: error : qemuMonitorIO:614 : internal
> > error End of file from monitor
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Ian Young <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I built and installed a libvirt 1.04 package from the Fedora src rpm.
>  It
> >> installed fine inside a test VM but installing it on the real hypervisor
> >> was a bad idea and I doubt I'll be pursuing it further.  All VMs
> promptly
> >> stopped and this appeared in libvirtd.log:
> >>
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:19.260+0000: 23567: info : libvirt version: 1.0.4,
> >> package: 1.el6 (Unknown, 2014-05-21-11:36:09, redacted.com)
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:19.260+0000: 23567: warning : virDriverLoadModule:72 :
> >> Module /usr/lib64/libvirt/connection-driver/libvirt_driver_network.so
> not
> >> accessible
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:19.260+0000: 23567: warning : virDriverLoadModule:72 :
> >> Module /usr/lib64/libvirt/connection-driver/libvirt_driver_storage.so
> not
> >> accessible
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:19.260+0000: 23567: warning : virDriverLoadModule:72 :
> >> Module /usr/lib64/libvirt/connection-driver/libvirt_driver_nodedev.so
> not
> >> accessible
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:19.260+0000: 23567: warning : virDriverLoadModule:72 :
> >> Module /usr/lib64/libvirt/connection-driver/libvirt_driver_secret.so not
> >> accessible
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:19.260+0000: 23567: warning : virDriverLoadModule:72 :
> >> Module /usr/lib64/libvirt/connection-driver/libvirt_driver_nwfilter.so
> not
> >> accessible
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:19.260+0000: 23567: warning : virDriverLoadModule:72 :
> >> Module /usr/lib64/libvirt/connection-driver/libvirt_driver_interface.so
> not
> >> accessible
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:19.260+0000: 23567: warning : virDriverLoadModule:72 :
> >> Module /usr/lib64/libvirt/connection-driver/libvirt_driver_qemu.so not
> >> accessible
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:19.260+0000: 23567: warning : virDriverLoadModule:72 :
> >> Module /usr/lib64/libvirt/connection-driver/libvirt_driver_lxc.so not
> >> accessible
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:49.471+0000: 23570: error : do_open:1220 : no
> connection
> >> driver available for qemu:///system
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:49.472+0000: 23567: error : virNetSocketReadWire:1370 :
> >> End of file while reading data: Input/output error
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:49.473+0000: 23571: error : do_open:1220 : no
> connection
> >> driver available for lxc:///
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:49.474+0000: 23567: error : virNetSocketReadWire:1370 :
> >> End of file while reading data: Input/output error
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:49.475+0000: 23568: error : do_open:1220 : no
> connection
> >> driver available for qemu:///system
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:49.476+0000: 23567: error : virNetSocketReadWire:1370 :
> >> End of file while reading data: Input/output error
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:49.678+0000: 23575: error : do_open:1220 : no
> connection
> >> driver available for qemu:///system
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:49.678+0000: 23567: error : virNetSocketReadWire:1370 :
> >> End of file while reading data: Input/output error
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:49.681+0000: 23572: error : do_open:1220 : no
> connection
> >> driver available for qemu:///system
> >> 2014-05-21 20:36:49.682+0000: 23567: error : virNetSocketReadWire:1370 :
> >> End of file while reading data: Input/output error
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Ian Young <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> I was able to get it working by following these steps:
> >>>
> >>> 1. stop all instances
> >>> 2. service cloudstack-management stop
> >>> 3. service cloudstack-agent stop
> >>> 4. virsh shutdown {domain} (for each of the system VMs)
> >>> 5. service libvirtd stop
> >>> 6. umount primary and secondary
> >>> 7. reboot
> >>>
> >>> The console proxy is working again.  I expect it will probably break
> >>> again in a day or two.  I have a feeling it's a result of this libvirtd
> >>> bug, since I've seen the "cannot acquire state change lock" several
> times.
> >>>
> >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1254872
> >>>
> >>> I might try building my own libvirtd 1.0.3 for EL6.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Ian Young <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> So I got the console proxy working via HTTPS (by managing my own "
> >>>> realhostip.com" DNS) last week and everything was working fine.
> >>>>  Today, all of a sudden, the console proxy stopped working again.  The
> >>>> browser says, "Connecting to 192-168-100-159.realhostip.com..." and
> >>>> eventually times out.  I tried to restart it and it went into a
> "Stopping"
> >>>> state that never completed and the Agent State was "Disconnected."  I
> could
> >>>> not shut down the VM using virsh or with "kill -9" because libvirtd
> kept
> >>>> saying, "cannot acquire state change lock," so I gracefully shut down
> the
> >>>> remaining instances and rebooted the entire management
> server/hypervisor.
> >>>>  Start over.
> >>>>
> >>>> When it came back up, the SSVM and console proxy started but the
> >>>> virtual router was stopped.  I was able to manually start it from the
> UI.
> >>>>  The console proxy still times out when I try to access it from a
> browser.
> >>>>  I don't see any errors in the management or agent logs, just this:
> >>>>
> >>>> 2014-05-20 18:04:27,632 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> (catalina-exec-10:null)
> >>>> Seq 1-2130378876: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 55157049428734, via: 1(
> >>>> virthost1.redacted.com), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
> >>>>
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.GetVncPortCommand":{"id":4,"name":"r-4-VM","wait":0}}]
> >>>> }
> >>>> 2014-05-20 18:04:27,684 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> >>>> (AgentManager-Handler-3:null) Seq 1-2130378876: Processing:  { Ans: ,
> >>>> MgmtId: 55157049428734, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
> >>>>
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.GetVncPortAnswer":{"address":"192.168.100.6","port":5902,"result":true,"wait":0}}]
> >>>> }
> >>>> 2014-05-20 18:04:27,684 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> (catalina-exec-10:null)
> >>>> Seq 1-2130378876: Received:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 55157049428734, via: 1,
> Ver:
> >>>> v1, Flags: 10, { GetVncPortAnswer } }
> >>>> 2014-05-20 18:04:27,684 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConsoleProxyServlet]
> >>>> (catalina-exec-10:null) Port info 192.168.100.6
> >>>> 2014-05-20 18:04:27,684 INFO  [c.c.s.ConsoleProxyServlet]
> >>>> (catalina-exec-10:null) Parse host info returned from executing
> >>>> GetVNCPortCommand. host info: 192.168.100.6
> >>>> 2014-05-20 18:04:27,686 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConsoleProxyServlet]
> >>>> (catalina-exec-10:null) Compose console url:
> >>>>
> https://192-168-100-159.realhostip.com/ajax?token=CsPhU4m_R2ZoLIdXOtjo3y3humnQN20wt5fSPjbZOHtRh7nli7tiq0ZiWUuwCVIn7VwF6503ziEqCRejlRsVcsyQcUfemTRXlhAOpJUyRugyCuTjmbUIX3EY1cHnFMKwF8FXXZr_PgwyXGPEoOHhkdRgsyRiczbk_Unuh4KmRngATr0FPCLtqhwIMpnbLSYwpnFDz65k9lEJmK6IlXYKVpWXg2rpVEsQvaNlulrZdhMQ7qUbacn82EG43OY8nmwm1SYB8TrUFH5Btb1RHpJm9A
> >>>> 2014-05-20 18:04:27,686 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConsoleProxyServlet]
> >>>> (catalina-exec-10:null) the console url is ::
> >>>> <html><title>r-4-VM</title><frameset><frame src="
> >>>>
> https://192-168-100-159.realhostip.com/ajax?token=CsPhU4m_R2ZoLIdXOtjo3y3humnQN20wt5fSPjbZOHtRh7nli7tiq0ZiWUuwCVIn7VwF6503ziEqCRejlRsVcsyQcUfemTRXlhAOpJUyRugyCuTjmbUIX3EY1cHnFMKwF8FXXZr_PgwyXGPEoOHhkdRgsyRiczbk_Unuh4KmRngATr0FPCLtqhwIMpnbLSYwpnFDz65k9lEJmK6IlXYKVpWXg2rpVEsQvaNlulrZdhMQ7qUbacn82EG43OY8nmwm1SYB8TrUFH5Btb1RHpJm9A
> >>>> "></frame></frameset></html>
> >>>> 2014-05-20 18:04:29,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
> >>>> (AgentManager-Handler-4:null) SeqA 2-545: Processing Seq 2-545:  {
> Cmd ,
> >>>> MgmtId: -1, via: 2, Ver: v1, Flags: 11,
> >>>>
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.ConsoleProxyLoadReportCommand":{"_proxyVmId":2,"_loadInfo":"{\n
> >>>>  \"connections\": []\n}","wait":0}}] }
> >>>>
> >>>> If I try to restart the system VMs with cloudstack-sysvmadm, it says:
> >>>>
> >>>> Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)...
> >>>> curl: (7) couldn't connect to host
> >>>> ERROR: Failed to stop secondary storage vm with id 1
> >>>>
> >>>> Done stopping and starting secondary storage vm(s)
> >>>>
> >>>> Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)...
> >>>> curl: (7) couldn't connect to host
> >>>> ERROR: Failed to stop console proxy vm with id 2
> >>>>
> >>>> Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) .
> >>>>
> >>>> Stopping and starting 1 running routing vm(s)...
> >>>> curl: (7) couldn't connect to host
> >>>> 2
> >>>> Done restarting router(s).
> >>>>
> >>>> I notice there are now four entries for the same management server in
> >>>> the mshost table, and they all are in an "Up" state and the "removed"
> field
> >>>> is NULL.  What's wrong with this system?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to