Thanks for the response. I am a complete novice when it comes to VLANs so hopefully I can pull this off. My hosts/guest physical network is using a Dell PowerConnect 2848 which says it supports VLAN tags so I'll look at its docs to see what I need to do to configure it.
You mention that the guest and public traffic must be tagged. Since I will not be using public IPs (or the notion of a public network) can I skip the public network or do I need to define it? My 192.168.1.0/24 network is already NATed out if the guests need outbound access to the internet. Inbound internet traffic is not available. On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru < [email protected]> wrote: > Currently CS supports security groups functionality only with bridge > networking mode. > > If you are ok with out security groups then with advanced shared you will > be able to achieve what you are looking for. Advanced shared expects > tagged VLANs for guest and public traffic types. > > On 15/08/13 5:35 AM, "Carlos Reategui" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Hi All, > > > >The Cloudstack docs for XenServer say to use bridge networking when using > >basic networking. Is this still the case with CS 4.1 and XS 6.1? > > > >XS 6.1 introduced LACP which I would prefer to use but it is not supported > >with bridge networking. I think my storage network would benefit from it. > > > >If still required for basic networking then can someone walk me through > >how > >to setup an advanced network that behaves like a basic, shared, no > >security > >group network. I have 8 nics in 2 bonds (4 nics each -- one labeled > >storage for NFS SR and the other cloud-public for management/guest > >traffic). The hosts and the guests are in 192.168.1.0/24 and the storage > >network is isolated on its own in a 192.168.200.0/24. > > > >thanks, > >Carlos > >
