XenServer 6.2 support is supposed to come in cloudstack 4.2. Thats what i gather from previous emails to dev.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:23 PM, KENT ORTELL JOHNSON <[email protected]>wrote: > I just installed XenServer 6.2 on a Dell R410 and tried to add it as a > host in cloudstack but CS told me "Unable to add host." And I look in the > management-server.log and it tells me that " Only support XCP 1.0.0, 1.1.0, > 1.4.x, 1.5 beta, 1.6.x; XenServer 5.6, XenServer 5.6 FP1, XenServer 5.6 > SP2, Xenserver 6.0, 6.0.2, 6.1.0 but this one is XenServer 6.2.0" > > Does that mean that CloudStack 4.1.0 is not compatible with XenServer 6.2 > or does that just mean that the Xcp Server Discoverer is not compatible > with 6.2? > > see the pastebin link here: http://pastebin.com/7NZniFCc for the section > from the management-server.log > > Kent Johnson > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Comerford [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 5:56 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Architecture Question > > np :) > Looking forward to knowing the answer to this one actually. > > Best regards, > David Comerford > ------------------------ > Tel: +353 87 1238295 > Email: [email protected] > Website: http://dave.ie > GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie > > > On 7 August 2013 00:50, Bradley Hieber <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I do appreciate the assistance David > > - > > Sent from Mailbox for iPhone > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:48 PM, David Comerford <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Ah I understand. So you need a "DMZ" network tier with some device > > > on it that filters all traffic to and from the other tiers? > > > That's a bit beyond my VPC experience, sorry. Hopefully someone else > > might > > > chime in at this point :) > > > Best regards, > > > David Comerford > > > ------------------------ > > > Tel: +353 87 1238295 > > > Email: [email protected] > > > Website: http://dave.ie > > > GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie > > > On 7 August 2013 00:39, Bradley Hieber <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> In the design we are building, we need to have a DMZ tier that > > encompasses > > >> all of the VPC's and all traffic needs to pass through it. > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:15 PM, David Comerford > > >> <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > You don't need a proxy. The VPC is held together by the virtual > > router. > > >> > That forwards the traffic to and from all the zones/DMZs or the > > >> CloudStack > > >> > term "network tiers". > > >> > > > >> > Ideally you would make a Web network tier where the web servers > > >> > would reside. Anther tier for application servers, anto > > >> > > > >> > Best regards, > > >> > David Comerford > > >> > ------------------------ > > >> > Tel: +353 87 1238295 > > >> > Email: [email protected] > > >> > Website: http://dave.ie > > >> > GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On 7 August 2013 00:09, Bradley Hieber <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > I need to place a proxy and web servers in my DMZ. Am I just > > >> > > not > > >> getting > > >> > > something? > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:06 PM, David Comerford < > > [email protected]> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > The DMZ in your diagram would be the Guest Public network you > > >> > > > have > > >> > > defined. > > >> > > > Each zone you have behind the router can be isolated on it's > > >> > > > own > > VLAN > > >> > and > > >> > > > have it's own firewall rules controlling ingress/egress. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > This diagram might explain it a bit better: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/30747129/imag > > e001.png?version=1&modificationDate=1357237708000 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Best regards, > > >> > > > David Comerford > > >> > > > ------------------------ > > >> > > > Tel: +353 87 1238295 > > >> > > > Email: [email protected] > > >> > > > Website: http://dave.ie > > >> > > > GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On 6 August 2013 23:59, Bradley Hieber <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > How would I force the traffic to go through the DMZ? Would > > >> > > > > I > > set a > > >> > > small > > >> > > > > LAN in the virtual router to point to a proxy address in > > >> > > > > the > > DMZ? > > >> > > > > - > > >> > > > > Sent from Mailbox for iPhone > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:58 PM, David Comerford < > > >> [email protected] > > >> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > VPC's are the way to go. Your diagram is a text book > example. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.2/html/I > > nstallation_Guide/configure-vpc.html > > >> > > > > > Best regards, > > >> > > > > > David Comerford > > >> > > > > > ------------------------ > > >> > > > > > Tel: +353 87 1238295 > > >> > > > > > Email: [email protected] > > >> > > > > > Website: http://dave.ie > > >> > > > > > GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie On 6 August 2013 14:36, > > >> > > > > > Bradley Hieber <[email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> It could very well be VPC's. The idea is we are planning > > >> > > > > >> on > > >> using > > >> > > 5-6 > > >> > > > > hosts > > >> > > > > >> in this environment. So designing the solution to fit > > >> > > > > >> this > > >> > hardware > > >> > > > > >> requirement is critical. > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Murali Reddy < > > >> > > [email protected] > > >> > > > > >> >wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > Can 'hosting zones' represented in diagram can be > > >> > > > > >> > contained > > >> > into a > > >> > > > > >> > CloudStack zone? If so you can dedicated set of hosts > > >> > > > > >> > to > > be in > > >> > the > > >> > > > > DMZ. > > >> > > > > >> > Then you can leverage 'host tags' [1] functionality to > > place > > >> > VM's > > >> > > > > >> > providing edge services (CloudStack system VM's or > > >> > > > > >> > user > > VM's) > > >> on > > >> > > the > > >> > > > > >> hosts > > >> > > > > >> > dedicated in DMZ. > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > [1] > > >> > > > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/host-tags-and-storage-tags.html > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > On 05/08/13 11:28 PM, "Bradley Hieber" < > > [email protected]> > > >> > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >The goal is to have a virtualized dmz area where we > > >> > > > > >> > >can > > place > > >> > > > public > > >> > > > > >> > >facing > > >> > > > > >> > >webservers, and other software based firewalls to > > >> > > > > >> > >protect > > the > > >> > > > > different > > >> > > > > >> > >virtualization areas. Each of the virtualization > > >> > > > > >> > >areas > > will > > >> > host > > >> > > > > >> different > > >> > > > > >> > >environments for clients to utilize. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Chip Childers > > >> > > > > >> > ><[email protected]>wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> Can you explain a bit more about what your diagram > > implies? > > >> > > That > > >> > > > > >> might > > >> > > > > >> > >> help us help you. > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Bradley Hieber < > > >> > > > > [email protected] > > >> > > > > >> > >> >wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > >> > Is it possible to create this type of > > >> > > > > >> > >> > architecture > > with > > >> > > > > cloudstack? > > >> > > > > >> > >>Any > > >> > > > > >> > >> > design ideas you can provide? > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/7940/lnzp.jpg > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > -- > > >> > > > > >> > >> > Brad > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >-- > > >> > > > > >> > >Brad > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> -- > > >> > > > > >> Brad > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Brad > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Brad > > >> > > >
