Yes in case of vpc it is by design Yong Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi guys, I found Conserve mode tick box is greyed out if VPC is selected in network offering creation window. Is this by design to separate inbound port forwarding to a different public IP from the source NAT one? Regards, Yong -----Original Message----- From: Len Bellemore [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 14 June 2013 1:20 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Port Forwarding and Source NAT That's it! thanks -----Original Message----- From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 13 June 2013 11:55 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Port Forwarding and Source NAT Hi Len, While creating network offering we have an option to enable/disable conserver mode. If conserver mode is on we can use the source NAT ip address for port forwarding. Thanks, Sanjeev -----Original Message----- From: Len Bellemore [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 4:16 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Port Forwarding and Source NAT Hi Guys, I have configured an Advanced Zone without Security Groups. I've set up a network offering with a virtual router with the following services: UserData, PortForwarding, Vpn, Dhcp, Dns, Firewall, SourceNat, Lb, StaticNat When I create a network, I get a public IP address with (source NAT) appended to the IP Address and I am only able to create Firewall rules. I can't set up port forwarding. If I want to configure port forwarding so that I can serve web pages from my vms, I need to allocated more public IP addresses. Is there a way to set up port forwarding on a source-nat IP address? Am I going about this the wrong way? Thanks Len
