Well I have used the file component both in a VM, docker and a physical host and did not see any drop in performance. There must be something else on your physical host that is cause this.
Have you done any profiling or enabled AuditEventNotifier on Camel to see which steps are taking the most time? Where is your ActiveMQ located? On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:56 PM, shuston [via Camel] < [email protected]> wrote: > Did you run it multiple times in succession for each scenario? The file > system cache may skew your timing if you just run it once. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: RichardChen [mailto:[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5794958&i=0>] > > Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 5:13 AM > > To: [hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5794958&i=1> > > Subject: Camel performance issue > > > > We are facing performance problem when we integrate camel into our > > product. > > The simple scenario is this: let camel monitor a folder, put 1000 xml > files to > > that folder, camel consume all the files and send them to ActiveMQ. > > > > I ran this scenario in both physical machine and VM(hosted on the same > > physical machine). The result is really confused me, the VM's > performance is > > higher than physical machine. > > I found that, camel on VM consumed files very fast, but meanwhie > physical > > machine was slow. > > > > Anthoer thing is our product pervious using Mule ESB, the performance is > > higher than camel when running the same scenario. > > > > Our testing evniroment is clean, no anti-virus software installed. Do OS > > version impact the result? > > We are using Windows7 x64 and Windows Server 2012 x64, camel is running > > on Apache Tomcat 8.5.6. > > > > Have you met the same problem when using camel? Or is there some > > advices on improving performance of my scenario? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel- > > performance-issue-tp5794918.html > > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-performance-issue- > tp5794918p5794958.html > To start a new topic under Camel - Users, email > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from Camel - Users, click here > <http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=465428&code=c291Y2lhbmNlLmVxZGFtLnJhc2h0aUBnbWFpbC5jb218NDY1NDI4fDE1MzI5MTE2NTY=> > . > NAML > <http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-performance-issue-tp5794918p5794960.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
