Hello, I'm new to this forum, but I've used camel for a long time. ( as a matter of fact, I can't imagine the thing that I am able to do my java project without camel ). Anyway, a question teased me whenever I use Camel. The question was "why is there no base framework for only camel?" In the other word, I believe it would be better if there was a certain light-weighted environment supporing camel with some better functionalities like concurrency, extensibility, hot deploy. So, when I told my colleague about this idea, he replied, "Use zookeeper for failure tolerance, use OSGI for hot deploy, use Storm or Spark for data distribution. You don't need to build another similar thing for your own purpose." But I can't make certain with his words because I can't understand the reason why I should control so many applications for my project. I just want a light-weighted all-in-one package. Is building such an all-in-one package for camel a silly idea? How do you think about that?
-- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/A-silly-idea-tp5776224.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
