So, I misunderstood that page on the Apache2 license: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
Can it be updated to reflect that we can use some third party licensed code as dependencies (only) in our ASLV2 projects without breaking the rules? Should I fill a Jira in the Legal commity space? Best too! Charlie 2014-09-23 22:22 GMT+02:00 Christian Müller <[email protected]>: > Thanks for reporting Charlie! > This is not indeed not complaint with the Apache rules. We will fix this > soon. > > Best, > Christian > ----------------- > > Software Integration Specialist > > Apache Member > V.P. Apache Camel | Apache Camel PMC Member | Apache Camel committer > Apache Incubator PMC Member > > https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642 > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Charlie Mordant <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Camel riders! > > > > I just checked the licenses of a project I own. > > This project as a dependency to camel-xmljson dataformat, which itself > has > > a dependency to XOM. > > The problem is that XOM as a LGPL License that is not compatible ASLv2. > > > > Any info on this? Any XOM ASL compliant alternative? > > > > Best regards, > > > > -- > > Charlie Mordant > > > > Full OSGI/EE stack made with Karaf: > > https://github.com/OsgiliathEnterprise/net.osgiliath.parent > > > -- Charlie Mordant Full OSGI/EE stack made with Karaf: https://github.com/OsgiliathEnterprise/net.osgiliath.parent
