That's unfortunate. My workaround is to do this. A better/cleaner
solution would be appreciated.
<setHeader headerName="process">
<groovy>Exchange exchange -> println (exchange.in.body)
</groovy>
</setHeader>
println was just an example. logging is not really what I want to do
in the groovy processor.
Max.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Willem Jiang <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, Spring DSL don’t support that , but you can use simple language which is
> supported by log to print the message body if you like.
>
> <log message="${body}” />
>
> BTW, the Java DSL you should is wrote in groovy.
>
> --
> Willem Jiang
>
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Web: http://www.redhat.com
> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
> http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
>
>
> On April 14, 2014 at 2:39:26 AM, Max Bridgewater ([email protected])
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does Spring DSL support Groovy in the processor construct? With Java DSL, I
>> can do this:
>>
>> from("direct:test")
>> .process { Exchange exchange -> println (exchange.in.body) }
>> .process { println (it.in.body) }
>>
>>
>> What about Spring DSL?
>>
>> I was hoping something like this would work:
>>
>>
>> Exchange exchange -> println (exchange.in.body)
>>
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> Max
>>
>
