Have a look at the following links: http://forum.spring.io/forum/spring-projects/integration/118876-spring-integration-2-1-request-reply-benchmark-tests-showed-very-poor-performance http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/fyi-SI-td5716049.html
Best, Christian ----------------- Software Integration Specialist Apache Member V.P. Apache Camel | Apache Camel PMC Member | Apache Camel committer Apache Incubator PMC Member https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642 On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Robert James Liguori <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello folks, > > > On the Code Ranch (formerly the Java Ranch), a question was posted > relative to the Apache Camel Components Poster promotion, of which I cannot > answer: > > Here is the question: > > > Camel seems to offer a better developer > experience (via the Fluent API) than Spring Integration; and certainly > offers more connector options. How does it compare in throughput? > Specifically, assuming String JMS messages of 1-10k in/out, Spring > Integration + JiBX > marshalling/unmarshalling can get me throughput of 1000's of messages > per second. Can Camel compete at that level? Years back, I remember > there being some issues with Camel/ServiceMix throughput being very slow > (10's to 100's of messages per second). > > > If anyone can answer this, can you please drop by the "Other Open Source > Projects" of the Code Ranch forum and give a helpful response? > > Btw, here is the direct URL: > http://www.coderanch.com/t/622920/open-source/camel-spring-integration#2848108 > > > Thank you so much, > Robert Liguori >
