On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:22 AM, gilboy <josephoto...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the response. > > Yes I was planning on configuring quartz to be stateful. > > However, even if I configure it to be stateful I am assuming once I hit the > splitter(assume message contains a list of objects) with parallelprocessing > enabled the quartz thread will complete before the threadpool behind the > splitter has completed all the tasks. >
No the splitter will wait for all the spltis to complete before it ends. > I am wondering if I can get the quartz thread to wait until all the threads > in the splitter have completed their tasks > > Thanks > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Splitter-EIP-query-tp5726095p5726137.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Email: cib...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
