On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2013, at 4:37 AM, Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't find info about this dataFormat (CXF_MESSAGE) in CXF. Does it exist
>> ?
>
> Yes it exists, but I'm really not exactly happy about how it works.   I'd 
> like to kind of "redo" it, but it would require a lot of internal CXF changes 
> which I haven't had time to figure all out either.
>
> Basically:
>
> MESSAGE/RAW mode sucks from a  CXF standpoint as pretty much all the CXF 
> processing is bypassed. (that's the problem you saw)   What's super confusing 
> about it is that is also REMOVES things that the user may be relying on (like 
> the SAAJ interceptors) that then can result in very strange error messages.  
> (again what you saw)   Really, I'm unsure why you wouldn't just use a pure 
> HTTP component for most of this OTHER than for the WSDL generation, but even 
> that is kind of doable if you have a static WSDL pre-generated.   In any 
> case, my gut feeling is that a pure http component would perform slightly 
> better.    For the most part, the advantage of this over the other two modes 
> is performance though.   Keeps the raw byte streaming, very little processing.
>
> PAYLOAD does allow all of the proper CXF processing.  Using StAX, it can also 
> do a lot of  "xml streaming", but XML streaming is much slower than byte 
> streaming due to the parsing and such.   HOWEVER, PAYLOAD just gives the 
> contents of the Body.  If you need to route the soap headers and attachments 
> and such along as well, you need to do more work.
>
> I was hoping that CXF_MESSAGE could be somewhere in the middle where you 
> could have CXF process everything correctly, but still be able to route on 
> the full message.   HOWEVER, with the way CXF works internally, we have to 
> build up a full SAAJ model in this case.  Thus, ALL of the streaming does not 
> work in CXF_MESSAGE mode.   This is what I was hoping to somehow change, but 
> would require a ton of work in CXF.   :-(    I'd like to be able to optimize 
> this isn't something closer to how the PAYLOAD mode works with the XML 
> streaming, but definitely requires a lot of work in CXF first.
>
> That said, when using WS-Security, we have to build the full SAAJ model 
> anyway so the broken streaming wouldn't be an issue.
>

Thanks a lot Dan for all this detailed information.
This should come handy to update the docs. So we got some pieces of
this new stuff there.


>
> Dan
>
>
>
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Willem jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> CXF_MESSAGE
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Charles Moulliard
>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat)
>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Email: cib...@redhat.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen

Reply via email to