Hi Guillaume,

Of course if there is more convenient way to communicate between
bundles there is no need in the component. On the moment of development
of this component there were multiple ways to do that, for instance:

1. jms component which is rather heavyweight to do inter-bundle communication 
in the same jvm.
2. vm component which is asynchronous and does not support transactions
3. nmr component which can be used in synchronous mode, but does not support 
pub-sub, although it
   does not prevent user from registering multiple consuming endpoints with the 
same name, so the
   messages are sent only to the first registered nmr-consumer.

The new direct-vm component solves the issue with transactions (like 
synchronous nmr does) but it does not
support pub-sub too.

To use a dynamic recipient list it's necessary to have some kind of custom code 
that will resolve
addresses of recipients at runtime. In such a case syncronous nmr can be used 
as well. The benefit of
OSGi services is that this is a standard functionality of OSGi runtime and even 
OSGi api predisposed
to work with an array of them. Furthermore you will get all the benefits of 
OSGi services, i.e.
dynamism, priorities, etc.

It would be nice if direct-vm allowed to configure pub-sub with all the options 
of multicast processor.

Regards,
Sergey

> I'm a bit skeptic about this component.
> It seems at first glance that if conflates a few things like osgi
> service access, multicast, etc...
> If the goal is to do inter-bundle communication, the new component
> coming from CAMEL-5370 should already do that and I don't really see
> the need for the component.
> For the multicast, using a dynamic recipient list coupled with
> direct-vm should work.

> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:57 PM,  <szh.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi gurus,
>>
>> Recently  I've  published  camel  component that uses OSGi services to
>> communicate between endpoints in different bundles.
>>
>> Here is the link: https://github.com/szhem/camel-osgi
>> I've already raised JIRA issue - 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5292
>>
>> So I'd like to have some feedback if it seems to be useful.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sergey
>>
>>

Reply via email to