I can confirm, I get the same error as you do when I remove the two last fields at the end of the line as you did.
I think this is the where it starts to get wrong: BindyCsvDataFormat.java 138 // Read the line 139 String line = scanner.nextLine().trim(); String.trim() trims all the remaining tabs... Den 29 mars 2012 11:17 skrev Aida <ai.d...@gmail.com>: > Hi again, thank you for the quick answers. > > I think I have been able to replicate the problem in an easy way. I have > built some test cases and I have found the one in which I'm having trouble. > The "required=false" option is working for me always except in one case. > > This case is when the two missing fields occur at the end of a line at the > same time. I'm going to explain it with my test cases. > > I have built a simple route for my unitary tests: > > from(URI_START_PROCESS) > .unmarshal().bindy(BindyType.Csv, "com.mypackage") > .to(URI_END_PROCESS_MOCK); > > > My class (I have only one) in "com.mypackage" has the following > annotations: > @CsvRecord(separator="\t") > from positions 1 to 5: @DataField(pos = N, required = true) > for positions 6 and 7 : @DataField(pos = N, required = false) (so fields 6 > and 7 are optional) > > Test Cases: > > Case 1: Processing two lines with ALL the fields (Works like a charm) > String data2Process = "data1\t14700\t2011-10-04 > 04:00\t5\t1\t5\t9\ndata2\t14700\t2011-10-04 05:00\t49\t2\t5"; > > Case 2: Processing two lines. In the first line the 6th field is missing > (works perfectly) > String data2Process = "data1\t14700\t2011-10-04 > 04:00\t5\t0*\t\t*0\ndata2\t14700\t2011-10-04 05:00\t149\t0\t0"; > > Case 3: Processing two lines. In the first line the 7th field is missing > (works perfectly) > String data2Process = "data1\t14700\t2011-10-04 > 04:00\t5\t0\t0*\t\n*data2\t14700\t2011-10-04 05:00\t149\t0\t0"; > > Case 4: Processing two lines. In the first line, both 6th and 7th field are > missing (is not working) > String data2Process = "data1\t14700\t2011-10-04 > 04:00\t5\t0*\t\t\n*data2\t14700\t2011-10-04 05:00\t149\t0\t0"; > > > I also tried a variation of Case 4, in which I made field 5 also not > required and the missing fields were 5th and 6th, in this case there were > no > problems. > > The exception is the one I said before: "Some fields are missing (optional > or mandatory), line:1" > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Bindy-Having-trouble-with-the-required-field-tp5597196p5603131.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
