I don't think you need a message converter for that. Why don't you try
setting the JMSType header after the inOut invocation to the bean? For
example:
@Override
public void configure(){
from(IN_QUEUE).choice()
.when(header("JMSType").isEqualTo("CommandType"))
.inOut("bean:messageListener?method=handleMessage")
.setHeader("JMSType").simple("${body.getClass.getCanonicalName}")
.otherwise()
.to("activemq:myqueue.in.DLQ")
.routeId("jms-my-route");
}
That should do the trick...
Regards,
*Raúl Kripalani*
Principal Consultant | FuseSource Corp.
r...@fusesource.com | fusesource.com <http://www.fusesource.com/> skype:
raul.fuse | twitter: @raulvk <http://twitter.com/raulvk>,
@fusenews<http://twitter.com/fusenews>
On 22 March 2012 16:08, Xuan Huang <xuan.hu...@gamesys.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have in my RouteBuilder something like this:
>
> public class MyRouteBuilder extends RouteBuilder{
> private static final String IN_QUEUE="activemq:
> myqueue.in?messageConverter=#myMessageConverter";
>
> @Override
> public void configure(){
> from(IN_QUEUE).choice()
> .when(header("JMSType").isEqualTo("CommandType"))
> .inOut("bean:messageListener?method=handleMessage")
> .otherwise().to("activemq:myqueue.in.DLQ")
> .routeId("jms-my-route");
> }
>
> }
>
> The handleMessage method in MessageListener processes the input and
> generates a POJO which is set to the message body, but the Type in the JMS
> header is not set to the proper return type. What is the proper way of
> setting the message converter for the reply message?
>
> Regards,
> xuan
