Hi, Using a relational store is definitely slower than KahaDB. KahaDB is a store that employs indexing & has a high speed journal to deal with efficient access to stored messages. The relational layer is more expensive due to the cost of SQL lookups & persistence...
However your requirement (250000 msgs daily, msg size ?), just based on number of messages does not seem out of the ordinary using either option (unless there is something about msg size that I do not see). KahaDB is easily the better and faster approach... Hope this helps. Cheers, Ashwin... ----- --------------------------------------------------------- Ashwin Karpe Apache Camel Committer & Sr Principal Consultant FUSESource (a Progress Software Corporation subsidiary) http://fusesource.com Blog: http://opensourceknowledge.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------- -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Activemq-for-high-performance-and-scalable-use-tp5541877p5542771.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
