RabbitMQ appears to be licensed under MPL 1.1 [1], but there is a new MPL 2.0 [2] that is purportedly more Apache-friendly [3]. Are MPL 2.0 projects compatible for incorporation in APL projects? I don't fully understand all the intricacies entailed, but perhaps new possibilities will arise [4].
[1] : http://www.rabbitmq.com/mpl.html [2] : http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/ [3] : http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/mozilla-license-becoming-apache-compatible/6039 [4] : https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rabbitmq-discuss/O1VTqoquetU/discussion ~ RNPG On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:16, Ashwin Karpe <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I believe, I had seen a submission a few months ago of a Camel RabbitMQ > component and had referred it to be hosted in camel-extras or at git-hub. > > Can you please look for it in this forum and in camel-extras/github... The > component was quite compelling and could not be brought into the Apache > Camel offering due to license restrictions in RabbitMQ. > > Cheers, > > Ashwin... > > ----- > --------------------------------------------------------- > Ashwin Karpe > Apache Camel Committer & Sr Principal Consultant > FUSESource (a Progress Software Corporation subsidiary) > http://fusesource.com > > Blog: http://opensourceknowledge.blogspot.com > --------------------------------------------------------- > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-features-depending-on-Camel-Component-tp5528357p5528713.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
