On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:05 PM, David Tombs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am using the resequencer EIP in a situation where it would be better > never to pass on a message at all than to process it out-of-order. The > EIP, however, will deliver out-of-order messages if the timeout occurs > before receiving an expected message. For example, we receive: > > 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, (wait 10s), 6. > > In this case, the rest of the route will receive messages in the above > order with 6 last. > > Any ideas on how to avoid this? My only thought right now is to put a > filter after the resequencer to reject any messages that would precede > the last message passed on. >
You can use a very high timeout value. > Thanks in advance, > David > > -- > Wise men _still_ seek Him. > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: [email protected] Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
