hello Camel!
Is it possible to use generics in annotated converters ?
I tried to do this
@Converter
public <T> T toPayload(Message<T> msg){
return msg.getPayload();
}
Which does not work. However, replacing <T> by a real class definition is
working for that type.
I would like to avoid to create one converter for each type of payload my
messages can have, is that possible ?
Thanks in advance,
Olivier
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Converter-Generics-tp2839250p2839250.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
