Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> I have created a ticket to track this issue
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1702
> 
> We will *only* do this migration at Camel 2.0 to keep the old behavior
> in Camel 1.6.x as this branch is maintenance and for important bug
> fixes only.
> Its intended for drop in replacements for production usage and this we
> cannot change such behavior. Even if it would make life easier.
> 
> 
> 

The ticket mentions automatic fallback from header -> property. That is not
available in 1.6.x as far as I know. That would solve half of the
workaround. 

It is a possibility to use header OR property for aggregation? That would
not really break existing implementations because the whole camel namespace
is used in the property.

The current splitter / aggregation implementation is really fragile without
good knowleds of camel 1.6.x

Regards,
Erwin
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Custom-AggregationStrategy-needs-specific-headers-tp23996092p24000219.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to