Hello JB,

This looks interesting. We used v5.18.6 as it supports Java 11 as we some 
legacy applications.

I was able to establish the connectivity using camel route in v5.18.6 and it 
works.However, this is not a true clustering. Meaning, 
CONTECH.CODES.THEO.MQD.IBM is local to IBM MQ and CONTECH.CODES.THEO.MQD.ACTIVE 
is local to ActiveMQ.

Can a true clustering be achieved in camel-wmq in v6.1.x so that I don’t need 
to create local queues replacing cluster queues?

Here is my existing route:

<camel:camelContext id="camel-bridge">
        <!-- IBM MQ to ActiveMQ Routes -->
        <camel:route id="ibmmq-to-activemq-queue1">
            <camel:from 
uri="jms:queue:CONTECH.CODES.THEO.MQD.IBM?connectionFactory=pooledIBMMQConnectionFactory"/>
            <camel:to uri="activemq:queue:CONTECH.CODES.THEO.MQD.ACTIVE"/>
        </camel:route>

        <!-- ActiveMQ to IBM MQ Routes -->
        <camel:route id="activemq-to-ibmmq-queue1">
            <camel:from 
uri="activemq:queue:CONTECH.CODES.THEO.MQD.ACTIVE.REPLY"/>
            <camel:to 
uri="jms:queue:CONTECH.CODES.THEO.MQD.IBM.REPLY?connectionFactory=pooledIBMMQConnectionFactory"/>
        </camel:route>

Thanks & Regards,
…………………………………………………………..
Rohini Kumar
Associate Tech Lead - Middleware
Thomson Reuters
Mobile: +91 97392 11168
Work Hours: 13:00 to 22:00 IST [Mon – Fri]
Escalation

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> 
Sent: 12 June 2025 21:04
To: rohinikumar.bethap...@thomsonreuters.com.invalid
Cc: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: [EXT] Re: ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.6 - Clustering

External Email: Use caution with links and attachments.

Hi Rohini

Just curious: any particular reason for ActiveMQ 5.18.x ?
I would suggest to evaluate if ActiveMQ 6.1.x is not option ?

Regarding Camel, I wrote camel-wmq directly using IBM MQ API (not JMS). Due to 
license constraints, it's not part of Camel, it's in
camel-extra:

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/camel-extra/camel-extra/tree/master/components/camel-wmq__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!f49sYDgtfq4WfXS6WwPiEoxc4IdKDiHO4ittuyfJ6YkgM2gsspzvT57NEJ6X6_S84Grj6fwCH2oWYjv-YJKTRauW7AQ$
 

I have several users that use camel-wmq to/from IBM MQ and camel-jms to/from 
ActiveMQ. So you can create a route from IBM MQ and ActiveMQ easily.

Regards
JB

On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 11:17 AM Bethapudi, Rohini Kumar (TR
Technology) <rohinikumar.bethap...@thomsonreuters.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am working on migrating IBM MQ to ActiveMQ. Currently, IBM MQ (Linux) and 
> IBM MQ (Mainframe) are part of a MQ cluster.  I am looking for some guidance 
> on implementing clustering in ActiveMQ classic 5.18.6.
>
> Here is my Scenario
>
> - IBM MQ servers on mainframe (remaining as-is)
> - IBM MQ servers on Linux (being migrated to ActiveMQ 5.18.6)
> - Currently, these systems form an IBM MQ cluster with cluster queues
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> ....................................................................
> Rohini Kumar
> Associate Tech Lead - Middleware
> Thomson Reuters
> Mobile: +91 97392 11168
> Work Hours: 13:00 to 22:00 IST [Mon - Fri] 
> Escalation<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://trten.sharepoint.com/si
> tes/intr-ihn-service-portfolio/SitePages/IHN-Contact-*26-Escalation(1)
> .aspx__;JQ!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!f49sYDgtfq4WfXS6WwPiEoxc4IdKDiHO4ittuyf
> J6YkgM2gsspzvT57NEJ6X6_S84Grj6fwCH2oWYjv-YJKTwJZS-lk$ >
>
> This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient and contains 
> information that may be privileged and/or confidential. If you are not 
> an intended recipient, please notify the sender by return e-mail and 
> delete this e-mail and any attachments. Certain required legal entity 
> disclosures can be accessed on our website: 
> https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/resources/disclosures.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@activemq.apache.org For further 
information, visit: 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://activemq.apache.org/contact__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!f49sYDgtfq4WfXS6WwPiEoxc4IdKDiHO4ittuyfJ6YkgM2gsspzvT57NEJ6X6_S84Grj6fwCH2oWYjv-YJKT2fONV-Y$
 


Reply via email to