We seem to be using only the
org.apache.artemis.client.cdi.configuration.ArtemisClientConfiguration
interface in order to register a custom configuration (according to the
comments in our code this prevents artemis from using an embedded broker
instead of our external one). We are not using anything else from
artemis-cdi-client. I'd of course be be glad if at least this part of
artemis-cdi-client is not removed ^^.
If you tell me what exactly should become of artemis-cdi-client, i.e.
what parts you want to keep and whether you want to upgrade in-place or
move the jakarta stuff to a new module I'd be happy to contribute this!
Christian
On 08.01.25 18:18, Justin Bertram wrote:
External Message - Please be cautious when opening links or attachments
Am I missing something or is there no jakarta alternative for
artemis-cdi-client yet?
You're not missing anything. There is currently no Jakarta alternative for
the artemis-cdi-client module.
If so, is there something planned in this regard...
There is nothing currently planned as far as I'm aware. I wasn't even aware
that it used javax classes and therefore needed a Jakarta alternative. That
said, it would be relatively simple to create a Jakarta alternative as has
been done for other modules.
That said, I was thinking of deprecating this module and removing it in the
impending 3.0 release because there's never been any indication that folks
are actually using it. I think you're the first person to ever ask a
question about it. Can you elaborate on your use-case and if there would be
any alternatives if this module was removed in the future? I certainly
don't mind keeping it around if folks are using it and there are no
compelling alternatives.
Justin
On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 5:21 AM Christian Ortlepp <
christian.ortl...@hypergene.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to migrate a project which uses
artemis-jms-client, artemis-jms-server, artemis-jdbc-store and
artemis-cdi-client from javax to jakarta. While there are jakarta
replacements for the client and server and the jdbc-store dependency
doesn't seem to use javax/jakarta, artemis-cdi-client does depend on
some javax libraries (inject and annotations) and I could not find any
replacement for it.
Am I missing something or is there no jakarta alternative for
artemis-cdi-client yet? If so, is there something planned in this
regard, do you want to do the upgrade in-place or create a new artifact
similarly to artemis client/server?
Best Regards,
Christian Ortlepp
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@activemq.apache.org
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@activemq.apache.org
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
