Thank you for your help. If I understand correctly, you are using the CLI
tool, which is fine. As I said before, I also get normal results using
Artemis Java Client. The problem is that it cannot be used with
JMSTemplate. You can refer to the
"artemis-problem-demo/artemis-node1/src/test/java/com/artemis/example/SendMessageTest.java"
file in my demo project.

Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> 于2024年11月27日周三 12:10写道:

> I used your demo, but everything worked fine. I also tested with standalone
> 2.19.1, and everything worked fine. I added more details to my answer on
> Stack Overflow.
>
> Based on all the evidence so far there is no problem.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 9:38 PM F G <yu1638234...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Justin, I added a demo of the problem in the comment section of
> your
> > Stack Overflow answer. If you have time to try and confirm that it is a
> > version problem, I will mark your answer for future people who use
> version
> > 2.19.1 (the last version that supports jdk8) and have the same business
> > scenario. In my problem, the only problem with the artemis client
> solution
> > is that the message cannot be previewed. Your answer has helped me solve
> > the problem.😄
> >
> > Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> 于2024年11月26日周二 02:26写道:
> >
> > > It's possible there's a bug in 2.19.1 that's causing this to fail for
> > you,
> > > but I can't actually recall any fixes that might apply directly to this
> > > use-case. In any case, I tested with 2.38.0 and everything worked as
> > > expected. I responded more fully on Stack Overflow.
> > >
> > >
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 4:12 AM F G <yu1638234...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello everyone, I am using Artemis2.19.1. I encountered a problem
> about
> > > the
> > > > "divert" message diversion. I would like to ask if you have a good
> > > > solution. The problem address is ActiveMQ Artemis message multicast
> > > divert
> > > > anycast failed <https://stackoverflow.com/q/79219786/13835095>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to