Is there a compelling reason to use Jetty 10 vs. 9 for the ActiveMQ Classic use-case?
Justin On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 3:59 PM Mau, I-Min <i-min....@fisglobal.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi, > > I am a bit surprised when another colleague pointed out to me that on > https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/classic-05-18-04 > The Jetty version listed is only 9.4.x > This is because for our own software that runs with Java 11, we have been > using Jetty 10 without any problems. > So I am just curious if there's any particular reason why Apache chose to > NOT use Jetty 10 with ActiveMQ and Java 11? > > Thanks, > The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or > confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the > message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message > in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please > be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving > and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. Message > Encrypted via TLS connection >
