Hello JB, sorry to bother I've seen in another thread you're familiar with Jolokia integration inside ActiveMQ Maybe you have got an advice also for me, on this thread?
Thank you so much in advance *Distinti Saluti / *Kind Regards M.G. Il giorno ven 23 feb 2024 alle ore 14:24 Marco Garavello < [email protected]> ha scritto: > Hello, > > anyone has an advice? > Thanks in advance > > > *Distinti Saluti / *Kind Regards > M.G. > > > Il giorno mer 14 feb 2024 alle ore 09:34 Marco Garavello < > [email protected]> ha scritto: > >> Hello, >> >> maybe this could not be the right place where to ask similar information >> Any advice regarding where to ask for support on this matter? >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> >> *Distinti Saluti / *Kind Regards >> M.G. >> >> >> Il giorno mar 6 feb 2024 alle ore 14:22 Marco Garavello < >> [email protected]> ha scritto: >> >>> Hello again, >>> >>> to whom reads this I propose this very fast test, as statistic and >>> learning, which could help me a lot: can you please execute this command on >>> the VM where your primary AMQ instance is running >>> >>> "curl -v http://localhost:8161/api/jolokia"; >>> >>> and post here the HTTP status code you receive? >>> >>> >>> *Distinti Saluti / *Kind Regards >>> M.G. >>> >>> >>> >>> Il giorno ven 2 feb 2024 alle ore 08:48 Marco Garavello < >>> [email protected]> ha scritto: >>> >>>> Hello everybody, >>>> >>>> is there someone here who has got experience configuring Jolokia auth >>>> on ActiveMQ? >>>> I'm facing issue as my previous mail - summarizing I have got 2 >>>> independent AMQ brokers running v5.17.2, and querying >>>> http://localhost:8161/api/jolokia on one broker I receive " *HTTP/1.1 >>>> 200 OK* ", while on the other I get " *HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized* " >>>> The goal is to obtain 200 on both of them. Any advice? >>>> >>>> Thank you so much in advance! >>>> >>>> *Distinti Saluti / *Kind Regards >>>> M.G. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Il giorno lun 29 gen 2024 alle ore 11:22 Marco Garavello < >>>> [email protected]> ha scritto: >>>> >>>>> Hello everybody, >>>>> >>>>> I'm new here, so excuse me if I will not adhere completely to the best >>>>> practices of this mailing list. I'll do my best! >>>>> >>>>> I've got a strange issue: doing "curl -v >>>>> http://localhost:8161/api/jolokia"; on an Ubuntu VM with ActiveMQ >>>>> v5.17.2 running, I receive this >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ** Trying 127.0.0.1:8161...* Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1) port >>>>> 8161 (#0)> GET /api/jolokia HTTP/1.1> Host: localhost:8161> User-Agent: >>>>> curl/7.81.0> Accept: */*>* Mark bundle as not supporting multiuse< >>>>> HTTP/1.1 >>>>> 401 Unauthorized< WWW-Authenticate: basic realm="ActiveMQRealm"< >>>>> Cache-Control: must-revalidate,no-cache,no-store< Content-Type: >>>>> text/html;charset=iso-8859-1< Content-Length: 377<<html><head><meta >>>>> http-equiv="Content-Type" >>>>> content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"/><title>Error 401 >>>>> Unauthorized</title></head><body><h2>HTTP ERROR 401 >>>>> Unauthorized</h2><table><tr><th>URI:</th><td>/api/jolokia</td></tr><tr><th>STATUS:</th><td>401</td></tr><tr><th>MESSAGE:</th><td>Unauthorized</td></tr><tr><th>SERVLET:</th><td>-</td></tr></table></body></html>* >>>>> Connection #0 to host localhost left intact* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> BUT, if I do the same command on another Ubuntu VM with ActiveMQ >>>>> v5.17.2 running (but with different configuration, of course), I receive >>>>> this >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ** Trying 127.0.0.1:8161...* TCP_NODELAY set* Connected to localhost >>>>> (127.0.0.1) port 8161 (#0)> GET /api/jolokia HTTP/1.1> Host: >>>>> localhost:8161> User-Agent: curl/7.68.0> Accept: */*>* Mark bundle as not >>>>> supporting multiuse< HTTP/1.1 200 OK< Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:11:55 GMT< >>>>> X-FRAME-OPTIONS: SAMEORIGIN< Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8< >>>>> Cache-Control: no-cache< Pragma: no-cache< Expires: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 >>>>> 09:11:55 GMT< Transfer-Encoding: chunked* >>>>> *[...]* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So the question is: which configuration should I modify to control >>>>> this different behaviour? >>>>> I already get through all the configuration files, making diff, >>>>> setting things etc but still I'm not able to let the 1st machine answer >>>>> 200 >>>>> to my request, as the 2nd machine does. >>>>> >>>>> Please advise >>>>> Have a good day! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Distinti Saluti / *Kind Regards >>>>> M.G. >>>>> >>>>
